DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD vs — 1967 PLC 691

Citation: 1967 PLC 691

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal

Year: 1968

Decision Date: 1968-11-07

Parties: DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD vs AMANULLAH QURESHI AND ANOTHER

Headnotes

admittedly communicated to appellant on 29th February 1968.The decision became final within the meaning of section 12 (4) of the Ordinance, which could not be questioned before any judicial authority on that date. It is true that a decision under Section 30 of the Ordinance, which is equivalent to section 37 of the new Ordinance, is appealable.The right of appeal is a vested right, which can be exercised under the law prevailing at the date when the order is passed.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Industrial Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Inamullah Khan Title:DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD vs AMANULLAH QURESHI AND ANOTHER Case No.: Appeal No. HYD-9 of 1968 Date of Judgment:1968-11-07 Reported As: 1970 PLC 58 Result: accordingly dismissed Judgment ORDER This is an appeal under section 12 (5) of the Industrial Disputes Ordinance, 1959 (hereinafter called the Ordinance The appeal is directed against the order of the Second We Pakistan Industrial Court, Karachi, dated 6th January 196 on an application under section 30 of the Ordinance. The facts briefly put are these. Amanullah Qureshi, the respondent No. 1, is a Conduct in the Government Transport Service, Hyderabad. It is alleged that he had failed to issue tickets to 34 passengers and that be h realised Rs. 1.85 and Rs. 1.60, from two passengers' while had issued tickets for 0.25 paisas to each one of them. Amanull Qureshi was charge-sheeted and found guilty. Amanullah Qureshi was an Executive of the Registered Trade Union and as the Industrial Dispute bearing No. 63/64, a No. 81/64, were pending adjudication before the Second West Pakistan Industrial Court, Karachi, the appellant made application under section 30 of the Ordinance for permission dismiss the respondent from service. The learned Chairman of the Industrial Court came the conclusion, in the first place, that the Enquiry Officer partial and that the explanation given by Amanullah Qureshi respect of the charges was…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.