MUSHTAQ AHMAD vs RIASAT ALI AND ANOTHER — 1968 PCRLJ 340

Citation: 1968 PCRLJ 340

Court: Lahore High Court

Year: 1969

Decision Date: 1969-12-15

Parties: MUSHTAQ AHMAD vs RIASAT ALI AND ANOTHER

Headnotes

Case cited as 1968 PCRLJ 340

Judgment Text

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Shoukat Ali Title: MUSHTAQ AHMAD vs RIASAT ALI AND ANOTHER Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6233 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1969-12-15 Reported As: 1970 P Cr. L J 680 Result: Bail cancelled Judgment ORDER This order may be read in continuation of my order dated the 26th of November 1969. Syed Shamsuddin, D. S. P. Nankana Sahib, has turned up with the file of the case. He stated that he investigated this case and as a result, there--of, as contained in the Zimnis, he was of the view that Mushtaq Ahmad, the complainant, was not present at the spot and that Riasat Ali accused has been falsely charged in this case. According to him he examined several witnesses and was satisfied that Riasat Ali accused was at Lahore at the time. Of the occurrence. He stated that according to his investigation the licensed gun of the accused was in fact used by his nephew Akhtar Ali. He further stated that two witnesses named in the F. I. R., namely, Muhammad Ashraf and Nazir Ahmad, are the relation and tenant of the deceased respectively, and, in his opinion, the accused was innocent but as the complainant and the eye-witnesses were charging him with the crime it was desirable that the verdict of the Court should be obtained. He further stated that it was the policy of the Police Chief of the District that even if, as a result of the investigation, an accused was found innocent but the eye-witnesses named him he should be sent up for trial. In these…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.