Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PLC 464
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-11-18
Parties: Prevent: Md. Nurul Islam Khan, Chairman, M. Karim And S. A. Haleem,TAIZUDDIN AHNIAD vs MESSRS WASH & WEAR AUTOMATIC DRY CLEANERS, DACCA
Case cited as 1971 PLC 464
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Members Title:Prevent: Md. Nurul Islam Khan, Chairman, M. Karim And S. A. Haleem,TAIZUDDIN AHNIAD vs MESSRS WASH & WEAR AUTOMATIC DRY CLEANERS, DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 47 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-11-18 Reported As: 1971 PLC 464 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under section 25(1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The case of the first party is that he was employed as a washer man under the second party and he was drawing a last pay of Rs. 130,00 per month. On 17-1-70 his services were illegally and arbitrarily dispensed with without any notice or payment of any termination benefits, etc. He was not even paid the arrear wages of 17 days of January 1970. He sent a grievance petition to which he did not get any reply. Then he sent another reminder to which also he did not get any reply. Then he filed this case in Court for remedy. The case of the second party is that the worker voluntarily came away and he did not send any grievance petition as no such petition was received by them. No reminder was also received by them. They are willing to take him to his former post without any back wages. But the worker is not willing to accept this offer. Points for determination (1) Whether the services of the first party were illegally terminated? (2) What relief, if any, is the first party entitled to? FINDINGS…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.