Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1970 PLC 833
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-06-18
Parties: M. A. SHAHID TARAFDAR vs SIREFA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, SYLHET
Case cited as 1970 PLC 833
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title: M. A. SHAHID TARAFDAR vs SIREFA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, SYLHET Case No.: Complaint Case No, 539 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-06-18 Reported As: 1970 PLC 833 Result: N/A Judgment AWARD MD. NURUL HUDA, (CHAIRMAN): The petitioner M. A. Shahid Tarafdar was appointed as a Sales Executive under .the second party Sirefa 'Chemical Industries on a monthly salary of Rs. 300.00 with other amenities. The 'petitioner joined his service on 2-6-69,. He was, however, discharged on 10-8- 69 and it was communicated to him on 13-8-69. He submitted grievance petition on 26-8-69. But the second party did not reply to that. The petitioner has now come before this Court by an application under section 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, for reliefs under the said Act praying for arrear pay for the term- of his service, compensation for unfinished term of contract and for 3. months' notice pay. The second party did not appear, though notified. The point which engages our attention is whether the petitioner is a worker as defined in the Act, and whether he is entitled to the reliefs claimed in the petition. DECISION His service was of a contractual nature. The minimum period of contract for service is, 3 years. Both the. Members are of opinion that the petitioner is entitled to his wages for the un--finished term of the contract. I have, however, grave doubt as to whether…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.