Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1972 PLC 410
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1971
Decision Date: 1971-11-15
Parties: ABDUL WAHEED vs SATTAR INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI
Case cited as 1972 PLC 410
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Rasheed, Shoukat Ali A. Nanji, Hidayat Hussain Title: ABDUL WAHEED vs SATTAR INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI Case No.: Application No. 57 of 1971 Date of Judgment:1971-11-15 Reported As: 1972 PLC 410 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER HIDAYAT HUSSAIN (CHAIRMAN).-Applicant Abdul Waheed and other 16 workers of the respondent- Management have filed 17 applications under section 34 of I. R. O., 1969 against the termination of their services by the respondents. Through this application under section 45, applicant Abdul Waheed wants this Court to hold that the termination is merely a cloak to cover an illegal lock-out, and prohibited the continuance of the lock-out. A notice of this application was served on the respondent. Syed Zamirul Hassan appears for them. Mr. Saeed Pasha Lodhi for the applicants contends as follows :- (a) A Union was formed in the establishment and the workers applied for its registration on 22-10- 1971. As soon as the Union was formed the Management took steps to do away with the office- bearers of the union and to achieve that end the office-bearers were transferred from one shift to the other and then that shift was closed on 30th October 1971. (b) In terms of Standing Order 6, the Management was required to give one month's notice to the workers before the closing of the shift but the Management has failed to do that in this case. Syed Zamirul Hassan has following points to make :- (a) There is no collective bargaining agent…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.