Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

MUHAMMAD ALI vs THE STATE- — 1970 PCRLJ 737

Citation: 1970 PCRLJ 737

Court: Lahore High Court

Year: 1959

Decision Date: 1959-12-06

Parties: MUHAMMAD ALI vs THE STATE-

Headnotes

Case cited as 1970 PCRLJ 737

Judgment Text

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Ataullah Sajjad Title: MUHAMMAD ALI vs THE STATE- Case No.: Criminal Revision No. 953 of 1968 Date of Judgment:1959-12-06 Reported As: 1970 P Cr. L J 737 Result: Order accordingly JUDGMENT JUDGMENT This petition is directed against the order of Mr. A. S. Qureshi, Magistrate Section 30, Toba Tek Singh, dated 9th of September 196'8, whereby he refused to recall the prosecution witnesses for cross- examination at the instance of the accused and observed that the accused would be at liberty to call the witnesses for cross-examination under section 257, Cr. P. C., after a charge had been framed. 2. Some evidence had been examined in this case when the record was burnt. The police reconstructed the challan and submitted the case to the Curt again. Some witnesses were examined. The defence counsel expressed his inability to cross-examine these witnesses on the ground that the copies of the statements recorded under section 161, Cr. P. C., had not been supplied to him. The copies earlier supplied according to this petition had been placed on the record. The copies of the statements under section 161, Cr. P. C., were supplied again in due course and an application was made before the learned Magistrate to recall the witnesses who had already been examined, for cross-examination. The learned Magistrate observed that the accused would be at liberty to call the eye--witnesses in defence under section 257, Cr. -P. C. 3. It should be said in…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.