Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1972 PLC 586
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal
Year: 1971
Decision Date: 1971-11-23
Parties: WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY THE FAUJI SUGAR MILLS EMPLOYEES UNION vs THE FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN
Case cited as 1972 PLC 586
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Inamullah Khan Title:WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY THE FAUJI SUGAR MILLS EMPLOYEES UNION vs THE FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN Case No.: Application No. HYD-464 of 1971 Date of Judgment:1971-11-23 Reported As: 1972 PLC 586 Result: Answered accordingly Judgment ORDER This is an application under section 50 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (hereinafter called the Ordinance), for Interpretation. I may point out at once that the application is vague and does not pointedly mention as to what I have to interpret. It would have served useful purpose and mono so in the absence of any objection on behalf of the Management to dismiss the application on that ground. The applicant could have made another application specifically pointing out the clause which it wanted me to interpret. In the arguments however, Mr. A. Majeed, the learned Representative for the applicant, made it clear that the Union wants me to interpret Clause (1) of the Settlement dated 21st September 1970 arrived at between the Fauji Sugar Mills Employees' Union (hereinafter called the applicant and the Fauji Sugar Mill (hereinafter called the respondent). Para. 1 of the Memorandum of Settlement, which is sought to be interpreted, reads a under :- "The parties agree to refer the dispute relating to evolution of a Bonus Formula for arbitration of Mr. Hamza Khan Quraishi, District and Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, with a request to give his award by the 20th…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.