AHMED ALI vs THE PROPRIETOR, LATIF ART PRESS; DACCA — 1971 PLC 299

Citation: 1971 PLC 299

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-12-31

Parties: AHMED ALI vs THE PROPRIETOR, LATIF ART PRESS; DACCA

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 299

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): S. A. Haleem, Muhammad Karim, Nurul Islam Khan Title: AHMED ALI vs THE PROPRIETOR, LATIF ART PRESS; DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 245 of 1970 Date of Judgment:- Reported As: 1971 PLC 299 Result: case is dismissed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under section 25(1)(b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 which will be hereinafter called as Act. The case of the first party is that he was appointed as a Binder in the establishment of the second party in 1966 and his last pay was Rs. 100.00 per month. His services were orally dispensed with without any notice arbitrarily and illegally by the second party. He sent a grievance petition on 13- 4-1970 by registered post with A/D which was received by the second party on 15-4-1970, but there was no reply. The second party issued a show-cause notice upon the first party on 8-5-1970. The first party gave an explanation to this motivated notice. As the second party is not at all eager to fulfil the demand of the first party, he has instituted this case for getting all legal benefits as per law: - The second party has contested the case by filing a written statement in which, among other things, it has been pleaded that the case was false, frivolous, vexatious and misconceived and that it was not maintainable in the eye of law. The first party has no grievance. In the grievance petition the first party has alleged verbal…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.