2020 YLRN 52

Sheikh RAUF AHMAD VS Dr. NAZIR SAEED, MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V), BOARD OF REVENUE

Petitioner: Sheikh RAUF AHMAD VS Respondent: Dr. NAZIR SAEED, MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V), BOARD OF REVENUEHonorable Justice Ch. Muhammad IqbalMehmood Ahmad Bhatti,Farrukh Ahmed Khan

Court: Lahore High Court

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

2020 Y L R Note 52 [Lahore] Before Ch. Muhammad Iqbal, J Sheikh RAUF AHMAD---Petitioner Versus Dr. NAZIR SAEED, MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V), BOARD OF REVENUE---Respondent Writ Petitions Nos 96-R, 76-R, 136-R and 172-R of 2010, heard on 15th November, 2019. (a) Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975)--- ----Ss. 2(2) & 3---Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss. 2(b)(3), 4 & 13---Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Rules, 1959, R. 7-A---Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Ss. 33, 34, 35 & 37---Punjab Land Revenue (West Pakistan Amendment) Ordinance (XVIII of 1963), S. 37-A---Notification No. 236-66/948-R(L), dated 24.02.1966---Evacuee property, transfer of---Cancellation of allotment---Jurisdiction of Chief Settlement Commissioner---Past and closed transaction---Urban property---Building site---Petitioners were aggrieved of cancellation of their allotment and transfer of evacuee land by notification from Chief Settlement Commissioner---Plea raised by petitioners was that after repeal of evacuee laws, Chief Settlement Commissioner did not have power to cancel allotment as it was past and closed transaction and Settlement Authority was debarred to reopen the same---Validity---Held, since promulgation of Notification No. 236-66/ 948-R(L), dated 24-02-1966 treating urban properties of "Moza Amar Sadhu" as building site, there was no occasion with settlement authorities to make any allotment of land in question in violation of notifications---Notifications were still in field as same were neither withdrawn by authorities nor were set aside by any competent forum in such regard---Settlement laws stood repealed with effect from 01.07.1974 with promulgation of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act, 1975---Notified Officer under S. 2(2) of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act, 1975 was restricted only to proceedings immediately pending before repealing Act or matter remanded by Supreme Court---Modus operandi was furnished in S. 3 of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act, 1975 regarding disposal of urban land under policy to be framed by Federal Government in such regard---Land was shown in ownership of Central Government whereas names of petitioners was written in Column No. 4 meant to show possession of cultivator---No copy of Jamabandi was placed on record to show that names of petitioners/ alleged allottees were written in column of ownership (column No. 3)---No mutation was available in record in favour of alleged allottee sanctioned in respect of transfer of ownership rights (tabdeeli-e-hukook-e-malkiat)--- Entire record of all RL-IIs were sealed on 16-05-1973 under orders of competent authority due to imposition of complete ban on further allotment on account of declaration of all urban agricultural land as building site---Such factum ousted possibility of any allotment at Khata RL-II in favour of any claimant and such allotment was patently illegal---Colorful exercise was applied with collusiveness of parties to usurp valuable evacuee/State property---Protection could not be given to petitioners under past and closed transaction---Connivances of parties with adjudicator who had not enlarged his jurisdiction at his own whims and caprice and any such order passed by interested authority was coram non judice, void, tainted with grotesque motive---Such order had no legal protection and was not considered past and closed transaction---Alleged allotments in favour of alleged allottees were declared as bogus and subsequent alienees had to sail and sink with transferrer and they were debarred to claim any better title---High Court declined to interfere in orders of cancellation passed by Chief Settlement Commissioner as petitioners were unable to point out any perversity, illegality or jurisdictional defect in order passed by Chief Settlement Commissioner---Petition was dismissed in circumstances. Javed Akhtar Khan v. DCO/ District Collector, Sheikhupura PLJ 2019 Lah. 647; Shahid Pervaiz v. Ejaz Ahmad and others 2017 SCMR 206; Province of the Punjab, through Secretary, Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Lahore and others v. Syed Munir Hussain Shah 1998 PLC (C.S.) 868; Additional Collector, Sales Tax, Lahore and another v. Rupafab Limited and others 2001 PTD 2383; Fida Muhammad v. Pir Muhammad Khan (deceased) through LRs and others PLD 1985 SC 341; Mst.Naila Kausar and another v. Sardar Muhammad Bakhsh 2016 SCMR 1781; American International School System v. Mian Muhammad Ramzan and others 2015 SCMR 1449; Muhammad Yamin and others v. Settlement Commissioner and others 1976 SCMR 489; Bashir Ahmad and others v. Additional Commissioner with powers of Settlement Commissioner (L) and others 1983 SCMR 1199; Talib Hussain and others v. Member, Board of Revenue and others 2003 SCMR 549; Abdul Hamid v. M.B.R. and others 1994 CLC 1160; Mst. Aziz Bibi and 22 others v. Additional Commissioner (Revenue) with the Powers of Settlement Commissioner (Lands), Lahore Division and another 2002 YLR 3268 and Rasheed Ahmad and 2 others v. Additional Commissioner (Rev.) Notified Officer Gujranwala Division, Gujranwala and others 2007 CLC 1801 ref. (b) Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975)--- ----Ss. 2(2) & 3---Scheme for the Management and Disposal of Urban Evacuee Trust Properties, 1977, Paras.6, 11, 12 & 30---Disposal of evacuee property---Building site---Public auction---Scope---Building site could only be disposed of through an unrestricted public auction in terms of Para. 11 of the Scheme for the Management and Disposal of Urban Evacuee Trust Properties, 1977---All evacuee land vests with Provincial Government against paid consideration and attained status of public properties---Public functionaries are only trustee/custodians of public/ State land which land could only be disposed of in accordance with law---Most transparent and suitable modus operandi which better served case is putting such property to public auction. Muhammad Ramzan and others v. Member (Revenue) Chief Settlement Commissioner and others 1997 SCMR 1635 rel. (c) Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975)--- ----S.2(2)---Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss. 2(b)(3), 4, 13---Evacuee property---Cancellation of allotment---Chief Settlement Commissioner, powers of---Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958 was repealed through promulgation of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act, 1975---No fresh allotment could be made by Notified Officer/Chief Settlement Commissioner and if any earlier allotment of evacuee land was obtained fraudulently, he has inbuilt inherent power to investigate matter of fraudulent allotment of evacuee land---Fraudulent allotment has no sanctity in eyes of law and Chief Settlement Commissioner has jurisdiction to adjudicate or investigate genuineness of claim---If Chief Settlement Commissioner found existence of fraud committed in obtaining allotment of evacuee property, he can reverse such allotment order. Province of the Punjab through Member Judicial-V/Chief Settlement Commissioner, Punjab, Board of Revenue, Lahore v. Notified Officer, Lahore and others 2018 YLR 2073; Messrs Beach Luxury Hotels, Karachi v. Messrs Anas Muneer Ltd and others 2016 SCMR 222; Virasat Ullah v. Bashir Ahmad, Settlement Commissioner (Industries) and another 1969 SCMR 154; Chief Settlement Commissioner, Lahore v. Raja Muhammad Fazil Khan and others PLD 1975 SC 331; Muhammad Baran and others v. Member (Settlement and Rehabilitation) Board of Revenue Punjab and others PLD 1991 SC 691 and Shamrooz Khan v. Muhabbat Khan and another 1989 SCMR 819 rel. (d) Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)--- ----S. 42---Making part of periodical records--- Procedure--- Any person acquiring any right as a purchaser, inheritor, donee, mortgagee or otherwise in any estate, Patwari has to record such report in roznamcha to be maintained in prescribed manner and furnish copy of report within a week to concerned town committee or union council---Patwari under S. 42(3) of Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967 has to enter in his register of mutations every report made to him under S. 42(1) or (2) of Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967 and make an entry in roznamcha and in register of mutations regarding acquisition of any such right. Muhammad Shahzad Shaukat, Taha Asif and Taha Shaukat for Petitioner (in W.Ps. Nos. 96-R and 136-R of 2010). Mehmood Ahmad Bhatti, Faheem Ahmad Bhatti and Talib Hussain Baloch for Petitioners (in W.P. No.76-R of 2010). Farrukh Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Yaqoob Kanju and Mian Swaid Hanif for Respondent. Altaf-ur-Rehman Khan for Respondent No.5/DHA. Dates of hearing: 29th October, 13th and 15th November, 2019. JUDGMENT CH. MUHAMMAD IQBAL, J.---Through this single judgment, I intend to decide titled Writ Petition (W.P.No.96- R/ 2010) along with Writ Petition No.76-R/ 2010, Writ Petition No.136-R/2010 and Writ Petition No.172-R/2010 as common questions of law and facts are involved therein, which are arisen from one consolidated order dated 18.01.2010 whereby the allotment of M. Zaheer Siddique and Mst.Akhtar un Nisa was declared as bogus. W.P.No.96-R/2010

2. Brief facts of the case, as mentioned in the petition are that one Muhammad Zaheer Siddiqui, being a displaced person, was allegedly got allotted evacuee land measuring 91 Kanal 16 Marla comprising Khasra Nos. 1607, 1618, 1620, 1621, 1622, 1629, 1630, 1638, 1639, 1640, 1729, 1730, 1731, 1740 in Moza Amar Sadhu, Lahore vide Khata RL.II No.530 dated 05.05.1971 as Tayyandar. The said alleged allotment was entered in the Jamabandi for the year 1972-1973. He executed a general power of attorney in favour of Sh. Muhammad Farooq, who gifted the said disputed property to his brother/petitioner through gift mutation No.39419 dated 06.01.2003 which was also entered in the revenue record. One Ch. Muhammad Hafeez, Advocate filed application regarding the fake and fraudulent allotment in favour of said Muhammad Zaheer Siddiqui upon which, the inquiry was initiated against the alleged allotment of disputed land to probe the element of fraud. After the inquiry, the Secretary (S&R) Board of Revenue, Punjab directed the District Collector to review the gift mutation No.39419 dated 06.01.2003. The petitioner filed an application to the Chief Minister Punjab who ordered for holding of an inquiry into the matter and the Inquiry Officer recommended for restoration of the aforesaid mutation. The Senior Member, Board of Revenue vide order/letter dated 26.10.2005 constituted a committee for scrutinizing the relevant record. The petitioner filed a Writ Petition No.18199/2005 challenging the above letter dated 23.07.2005 as well as order dated 26.10.2005, and this Court disposed of the writ petition by remanding the matter to the Chief Settlement Commissioner for fresh decision. In the post remand proceedings, the Chief Settlement Commissioner, vide impugned order dated 18.01.2010, declared the allotment of Muhammad Zaheer Siddiqi as well as gift mutation No.39419 dated 06.01.2003, in favour of present petitioner, as illegal, hence this petition. W.P.No.76-R/2010 and W.P. No.136-R/2010 3. Brief facts of the Writ Petition No.76-R/2010 are that Syeda Akhtar-un-Nisa, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners was alleged allottee of land measuring 176 Kanal in Moza Amar Sadhu, Lahore. The general attorney of the petitioners visited the office of the Halqa Patwari in August, 1984 for obtaining the copies of latest Jamabandi of the said land when it revealed that Muhammad Nawaz and Muhammad Hussain, respondents Nos.3 and 4, had got allotted land measuring 254 Kanal 08 Marla on 10.03.1971 including the Khata of the petitioners in their favour with collusiveness of Settlement staff by inserting a page in RL.II of village Amar Sadhu and on the basis of forgery, they obtained a Robkar for incorporation of said khasra numbers in their favour. Further contended that respondents Nos.3 and 4 sold the land to respondent No.5/ Defence Housing Authority who forcibly got possession of the land from the petitioners. The petitioners filed W.P.No.336-R/1984 before this Court. 4. Syed Moiz Ahmad etc. the petitioners in Writ Petition No.136-R/ 2010 claiming themselves to be the progeny of Hafeez Ahmad, predeceased son of Aziz Ahmad and Mst. Akhtar-un-Nisa have contended that their grandmother Mst. Akhtar un Nisar along with respondents Nod.1 to 6 (of said petition), by excluding the names of the petitioners, filed evacuee claim and got allotted land measuring 176 Kanal in village Amar Sadhu, Lahore against the evacuee claim of their grand-father and petitioners being offspring of predeceased son of Aziz Ahmad are also entitled to the allotment along with other co-sharers. In earlier W.P.No.336 R/1984 filed by Mst. Akhtar-un-Nisa etc. the petitioners filed an application under Order I, Rule 10, C.P.C for their impleading as party which was accepted and they were made party in the said petition. This Court disposed of Writ Petition No.336-R/1984 vide order dated 12.02.2002 and remanded the matter to the Chief Settlement Commissioner/ Notified Officer who vide impugned order dated 18.01.2010 declaring the allotment in favour of the petitioners (Mst. Akhtar-un-Nisa etc) as well as in favour of respondents Nos.3 and 4 as bogus. W.P.No.172-R/2010 5. Through this writ petition, the petitioner/Defence Housing Authority, claiming to be the bona fide purchaser from respondents Nos.2 to 6, has challenged the order dated 18.01.2010, passed by the Chief Settlement Commissioner/ Notified Officer, Punjab whereby the allotment of the respondents Nos.2 to 6/vendors was declared bogus. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned order is without jurisdiction, against the law and facts of the case; that the matter is a past and closed transaction which cannot be reopened; that the Chief Settlement Commissioner has no jurisdiction to pass the impugned order after the repeal of evacuee laws; that the impugned order is non-speaking in nature and passed without application of judicious mind to the facts and law; that no fraud or forgery was committed by the petitioners, as such, the impugned order is illegal and liable to be set aside. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on a case cited as Javed Akhtar Khan v. DCO/District Collector, Sheikhupura (PLJ 2019 Lahore 647) and submitted that once the allotment has been reflected in the record of rights (Jamabandi) that entry for all intents and purposes is conclusive in nature and settlement as well as revenue authorities are devoid of jurisdiction to investigate the veracity of the said entry. 7. Learned Law Officers appearing on behalf of Settlement Department submit that the Chief Settlement Commissioner has jurisdiction to probe into the matter where any allotment has been obtained through practicing fraud and after perusing the record, the Chief Settlement Commissioner has rightly passed the impugned order which does not require any interference. 8. I have heard the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance. 9. As per record (in W.P.No.96-R/ 2010) one Muhammad Zaheer Siddiqui got allotted disputed land measuring 91 Kanal 16 Marla comprising Khasra Nos.1607, 1618, 1620, 1621, 1622, 1629, 1630, 1638, 1639, 1640, 1729, 1730, 1731, 1740 in Moza Amar Sadhu, Lahore vide Khata RL.II No.530 dated 05.05.1971 as Tayyandar and the said alleged allotment was entered in the Jamabandi for the year 1972-1973. Mst.Akhtar un Nisa etc. the petitioners (in W.Ps.Nos.76-R and 136-R of 2010) claim that disputed land measuring 176 Kanal bearing Khasra Nos. Nos.1625 (14-7), 1624 (10-6), 1619 (8-0), 1616 (14-7), 1615 (10-14), 1614 (5-10), 1646 (3-9), 1645 (15-3), 1644 (5-16), 1628 (3-2), 1627 (4-9), 1626 (6- 17), 1770 (4-01), 1768 (5-4), 1767 (3-2), 1766 (3-2), 1765 (7-8), 1778 (3-4), 1777 (4-0), 1776 (3-9), 1773 (3-11), 1772 (2-10), 1914 (2-6), 1913 (3-1), 1912 (1-9), 1911 (8-19), 1910 (6-12), 1930 (3-7), 1929 (4-9), 1928 (3-4), 1927 (5-4), 1926 (5-10) and 1931 (3-19) was allotted to them on 15.03.1972 against RL.II Khata No.579 in village Amar Sadhu Tehsil and District Lahore against the verified claim of her husband, Syed Aziz Ahmad a displaced person from India. 10. The main controversy in this case which requires determination is whether above said land was got allotted as per law and without any element of fraud. Admittedly the land in question was an evacuee land which conclusively falls in the jurisdiction of the Settlement Authorities. Section 13 of the Displaced Persons Land Settlement Act, 1958 confers jurisdiction upon the Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner to declare any evacuee land as a 'building site'. The above provision of law is reproduced as under: "13. Disposal of building sites. Any evacuee land declared by the Chief Settlement Commissioner to be a building site in pursuance of sub-clause (b) of clause (3) of Section 2 shall be disposal of in accordance with the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 and.- (a) In case the land is situated within the limits of a Municipal Corporation, a Municipal Committee, a Sanitary Committee or a Cantonment, as such limits exist on the commencement of this Act, the sale proceeds thereof shall be credited to the compensation pool constituted under Section 4 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 (XXVIII of 1958); and (b) In other cases, the sale proceeds shall be credited to one or more of the compensation pools constituted under Section 5." By exercising the power under the aforementioned provision of law the Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, West Pakistan, Lahore issued a Notification No. 236-66/948-R(L) date 24.02.1966 declaring the certain Khasra Numbers of urban agricultural land in estates of Shahdara, Kot Lakhpat, Dhana Singhwala, and Mouza Amar Sadhu, Lahore as building sites. The scanned copy of the aforesaid notification is reproduced as under: APPENDIX XI OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND RE-HABILITATION COMMIS-SIONER, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE The 24th February, 1966 No. 236-66/948-R(L).--- In exercised of the powers conferred upon me under clause (b) of subsection (3) of section 2 of the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, I, Dr. S.M. Ikram, S.I., C.S.P., Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, Pakistan do hereby declare the Khasra Nos. (list as under) of urban agricultural land mentioned in the estates situated in the urban area of Lahore as building sites for disposal under section 13 of the said Act. S.M. IKRAM, Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, West Pakistan NON RATION VILLAGE 1. Shahdara } (PARTIALLY). 2. Kot Lakhpat. } 3. Dhana Singhwala } (IN ENTIRETY) 4. Amar Sidhu } Statement showing the available area in non-rationed village of Shahdara, Kot Lakhpat, Dhana Singhwala, and Amer Sidhu.

Serial No.

Name of Village

Khasra No.

Area

K.M. Sq. ft.

Shahdara .

2-16-0

4-8-0

1-5-0

6-12-0

8-0-0

9-0-0

8-0-0

5-12-0

7-12-0

8-0-0

48/1

6-0-0

0-19-0

Khasra No.

Area

Kind of land

K.M.

537

2.7

Nehri Jhalri

538

8.7

539

9.14

540

2.15

541

8.4

542

3.11

Nehri

545

9.14

546-min

8.12

549

11.7

550-min

4.18

551-min

3.9

560-min

2.6

563

13.6

564

2.14

565

5.5

566

8.16

567

5.5

Banjar Qadim

568

10.8

569

3.6

Nehri

570

7.16

571

7.2

Nehri Jhalari

576-min

2.5

Ghair Mumkin Kulri

578-min

0.18

Nehri Jhilri

1864.0

4. VILLAGE AMAR SIDHO

1.14

Nehri

0.8

Banjar Qadim

2037/37

2.0

Houses

1.7

Tibba

2.7

10.12

5.0

17.9

9.16

Banjar Qadim

3.6

Nehri

3.1

0.2

101

4.10

Banjar Qadim

120

3.19

Tiba

122

0.9

Banjar Qadim

131

5.18

Nehri

134

6.0

135

0.11

142

5.10

145

3.0

146

1.19

162

1.11

Khatan

163

2.9

166

7.0

Banjar Qadim

167

13.18

Nehri

168

9.16

169

6.9

177

4.15

179

9.17

180

4.0

181

5.16

183

12.1

184

12.1

185

13.6

186

9.15

187

0.15

189

1.5

193

0.12

196

1.4

Banjar Qadim

197

0.8

198

11.11

199

11.11

200

1.17

201

3.2

202

8.12

Kallar

203

14.15

Banjar Qadim

204

4.2

205

4.16

206

4.13

207

6.1

208

1.6

209

63.14

Kallar

210

4.13

Nehri

219

13.12

220

14.6

221

4.19

222

6.12

223

7.4

224

10.4

225

10.4

226

16.7

227

6.1

228

5.13

229

4.13

230

3.12

242

3.7

243

33.14

244

7.12

245

12.0

246

12.16

247

14.6

248

20.7

Kallar

249

3.1

Nehri

250

5.11

251

8.13

252

8.13

253

7.1

254

7.8

255

11.14

256

10.6

Banjar Qadim

257

1.16

258

0.7

259

5.17

260

5.5

261

5.7

262

16.9

Nehri

263

1.3

264

1.3

265

5.17

266

1.17

Nehri

267

1.17

268

1.2

269

0.18

270

15.1

271

13.15

272

4.9

Banjar Qadim

273

6.7

274

5.13

275

0.4

Banjar Jadid

276

0.6

277

1.3

278

1.7

279

0.7

280

1.3

Nehri

281

0.12

282

0.16

283

1.7

Banjar Qadim

284

1.12

Nehri

285

2.17

Banjar Jadid

286

0.10

Banjar Qadim

287

0.10

Nehri

288

7.19

289

11.6

290

2.1

292

1.1

293

2.15

294

5.3

295

4.13

296

4.7

297

18.0

298

5.8

299

0.10

300

13.3

301

0.12

302

6.7

303

3.9

304

0.18

305

2.15

306

1.6

307

0.16

308

1.8

Banjar Qadim

309

1.11

Nehri

310

0.9

311

3.18

312

0.18

Banjar Qadim

313

5.0

314

0.11

315

1.16

316

6.10

318

27.0

319

4.13

Nehri

320

5.0

321

104

Banjar

322

24.10

323

1.11

Nehri

324

0.19

325

3.19

326

2.17

327

2.12

328

3.8

329

1.18

Banjar Qadim

339

7.9

340

8.11

341

7.0

342

7.9

343

8.8

344

6.4

345

8.12

346

14.0

350

30.13

361

1.16

Nehri

365

5.4

Banjar Qadim

381

6.13

Nehri

445

3.19

(Qabaristan 2.19 Banjar Jadid 1.0)

446

11.3

Qabaristan

496

0.10

Chahi

497

0.18

Banjar Qadim

2182/ 650

0.3

House

724

1.5

Ahata Chah

739

1.9

Chahi

751

0.12

Nehri

753

3.0

Chahi Nehri

764

2.1

Nehri

765

3.18

766

0.10

770

3.6

771

1.8

772

3.2

773

8.14

774

4.19

775

3.18

Nehri

779

1.18

781

8.12

782-min 7

8.4

783

4.11

786

8.12

791

1.12

792

8.1

796

6.19

799

3.12

800

3.18

801

9.6

811

9.4

830

4.8

831

4.5

832

4.8

833

7.4

835

5.6

836

5.9

817

3.18

818

4.1

846

7.13

847

7.7

849-min

2.7

Ahata Chah

853

2.4

Nehri

884

5.0

888

3.9

889

22.15

Kallar

890

2.19

Nehri

891

6.4

G.M. Kallar

892

9.12

893

3.14

894

4.15

Nehri

895

4.2

896

2.10

903-min

3.0

909

0.5

915

0.10

917

0.10

922

4.13

928

0.14

933

2.10

938

4.14

949

2.18

950

2.14

968

1.5

Banjar Qadim

974

7.6

Nehri

977

3.0

Banjar Qadim

981

0.10

G.M. Khatan

990

12.2

Nehri

999-min

6.0

Banjar Qadim

1001

1.12

Nehri

1002

2.10

1005-min

1.7

G.M. Tooba

1006

0.9

Barani

1007

4.9

G.M. Tooba

1008

13.12

1009

9.6

1017

1.0

Nehri

1020

1.9

Nehri 0.15 G.M. Khal 0.14

1023

0.19

Nehri

1037

16.14

1035

6.0

1042

7.4

1046

0.14

1047

2.4

1055

4.19

G. M. Aar

1056

1.8

G.M. Ahata Chah

1057

2.15

1058

1.10

1059

1.18

1060

7.10

1061

10.14

1069

6.0

Nehri

1070

15.18

1073

4.13

1084

0.18

1085

14.3

1087

8.4

1089

0.16

1090

6.1

1109

6.10

1111

0.12

1164

3.5

Ahata Chah

1172

0.12

Nehri

1173

6.0

1174

0.6

1175

0.3

1176

0.13

1177

0.15

1178

2.4

1179

1.19

1184

4.15

1185

1.14

Nehri

1187

10.18

1188

15.15

1189

7.2

1190

9.8

1191

19.17

1192

15.10

1193

3.0

Khatan

1194

8.4

Nehri

1195

11.15

1196

15.14

1197

17.18

1198

11.11

1223

17.5

1225

2.10

1253

10.18

1254

1.17

1255

8.14

1256

9.12

1257

10.3

1258

10.10

1259

14.3

1260

16.8

1273

1.10

1274

0.10

1296

7.4

1297

10.15

1298

4.0

1299

22.0

1300

8.16

1304

22.17

1306

1.6

1309

21.9

1313

6.8

1314

9.1

1315

6.5

1316

12.10

1317

16.9

1318

2.18

1320

0.17

1321

4.1

1322

21.9

Nehri 14.9 Havaili 7.0

1323

3.1

Nehri

1324

13.8

1329/1

0.15

Abadi

1330

2.4

Nehri

1351

5.2

1354

9.5

1356

0.11

"…

Read the unabridged text and precedent citation network on Al Wakeelo Legal Research Platform.

Related Legal Research & Directories

Browse all judgments from Lahore High Court
Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant