Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL vs DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL KARMACHARI UNION, — 1971 PLC 17

Citation: 1971 PLC 17

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-05-07

Parties: DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL vs DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL KARMACHARI UNION,

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 17

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL vs DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL KARMACHARI UNION, Case No.: Case No. 167 .of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-05-07 Reported As: 1971 PLC 17 Result: N/A Judgment DECISION MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN). This is an appli--cation, under section 45(1) of the Industrial lotions Ordinance, 1969, hereinafter referred to as the I. R. O., for prohibiting the strike that is in continuance in Delhi Muslim Hotel, Dacca, by the workers of the said hotel since the 21st April 1970. The case of the first party was that the hotel has got only 46 workers and they, have been working on the existing terms and conditions till rec5ntly when the workers formed a Trade Union and submitted a charter of demands. But in the bi-partite meeting for negotiation the workers did not turn up and as such, there was no negotiation. Then they served a notice of strike on the first party on the 31st March 1970 and resorted to the strike on the 21st April 1970, and thus leaving only 20 days in between the service of notice and the commencement of the strike, violating thereby the mandatory provision of section 28 of the I. R. O, Hence the strike commenced and continued by the workers is illegal and should be prohibited forthwith as it was causing financial loss to the first party employer. The second party entered into appearance by filing written statement wherein they stated that the first party had not been…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.