Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PLC 26
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-06-30
Parties: SHAHID ENAYETULLA vs THE GENERAL MANAGER, DAILY ---PAIGAM',
Case cited as 1971 PLC 26
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: SHAHID ENAYETULLA vs THE GENERAL MANAGER, DAILY ---PAIGAM', Case No.: Date of Judgment:1970-06-30 Reported As: 1971 PLC 26 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN). In this application, under section 25 (1)(b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act, which was heard- ex parte, the ostensible cage of the first party is that he was appointed as a Proof Reader in the Daily Paige of the second party on the 23rd January 1964 at a monthly pay of Rs. 125.00. On 25- 9-69 at 9 p. m. when the first party went to join his normal duty, the Section Incharge refused him to Allow to do so and informed him that he had been dismissed. There has been a gross violation of the provisions of law. His last pay was Rs. 179.00. As against his ', verbal dismissal he sent a grievance notice on 2-10-1969 under registered post with A/D. The second party called him on 25- 10-69 and again on 28-10-69 for compromise. But it failed due to the recalcitrant attitude of the second party. It appears in this case that the second party lawyer was present on 4th June 1970. But on the final date of hearing the second party was found absent on repeated calls. There was no submission on the side of the second party. In view of the facts and circumstances the case of the first party has been proved to the hilt, that he has been dismissed verbally.…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.