Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PLC 543
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-09-02
Parties: ABUL KALAM AZAD vs MESSRS TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES INC.
Case cited as 1971 PLC 543
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Juned Ahmed Chaudhry, Ms. Nurul Huda Title: ABUL KALAM AZAD vs MESSRS TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES INC. Case No.: Complaint Case No. 401 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-09-02 Reported As: 1971 PLC 543 Result: N/A Judgment AWARD MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under section 25(1)(b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 filed by Abul Kalam Azad who alleges that he was a daily rated worker under the second party Messrs Technical Enterprises Inc. for one year, thereafter he became a monthly rated worker from February 1968, at the rate of Rs. 180'00 per month. The services of the first party were, however, terminated by the second party on 31-3-70. At the time of termination of his services he was getting Rs. 220.00 per month. It is alleged by the petitioner that he being a permanent worker he is entitled to benefits under section 19(1) of the Standing Orders Act, 1965. But he was not given full benefits by the second party. So, he has filed this application before the Court for termi--nation benefits as detailed in his application: The learned Advocate appearing for the second party concedes that his client is agreeable to pay up the legal dues of the petitioner and that the petitioner has been paid Rs. 1,222---00. We are not concerned here so much with unpaid salary. The difference between the parties arises with respect to notice pay-whether it should be one month's pay or 3 months pay.…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.