Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Messrs PAKISTAN STATE OIL CO. LTD. VS Respondent: MUHAMAMD TAHIR KHAN and others
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Irshad Hasan Khan, Muhammad Arif, Qazi Muhammad Farooq Title: Messrs PAKISTAN STATE OIL CO. LTD. vs MUHAMAMD TAHIR KHAN and others Case No.:Civil Appeals. Nos. 1796 to 1798 of 1998 Civil Appeal No, 378 of 1999 Civil
JUDGMENT
Reported As: 2001 PLC (C.S.) 591 Result: Order accordingly Judgment JUDGMENT ' IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, C.J.---By this common judgment, we intend to dispose of the above civil appeals as well as civil petitions involving common questions of law and fact. 2. M/s. Riazul Haq Sheikh, Fateh Muhammad Khan and Abdul Hafeez Lakhoo, learned counsel for the petitioners/employees argued that notwithstanding the fact that their appeals before the Tribunal were barred by time, the question of condonation of delay should have been considered by the Tribunal sympathetically on account of prevailing confession with regard to the availability of remedy to an aggrieved person who was an employee in an organisation controlled by the Government. Reliance was also placed on Muhammad Nazir Malik v. S.A.T. Wasti and others (2000 SCMR 1255) wherein, in similar circumstances, the order of the Service Tribunal was set aside and the case was remanded with the observation that the Service Tribunal would reconsider the application for condonation of delay in the light of the observations of this Court in Muhammad Afzal v. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation (1999 SCMR 92). Before dealing with the merits of the case, suffice it to say that delay in filing appeals before the Tribunal is condoned in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases.
---
## Page 2
3. Mr. Lakhoo also placed on record particulars of officers appointed/posted against the management grades posts/management positions after termination of services of his clients to contend that the impugned order of termination was mala fide. The chart reads as follows: ' PARTICULARS OF THE OFFICERS APPOINTED/POSTED AGAINST ' MANAGEMENT GRADES POSTS/MANAGEMENT POSITIONS ' NAME OF THE MINISTRY: MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM & NATURAL RESOURCES ' NAME OF THE AUTONOMOUS BODY/CORPORATION: PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LIMITED {{TABLE}} Sr. No, Name of the Officer Name of the Post/De signation with Management Grade/ Management Position Date of Posting Date of Superannua- -tion/Tenure of Employment Terms and Conditions of Employment Date of Birth Place of Birth/ Province of Domicile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I Wajid Jamil Accounts Manager/ 01-08-00 06/12/17/1 Regular 6-12-57 Karachi/ Group-III Mth(s) Sindh Urban 2 Faiyaz Maklai Sr.Executive/ 01-07-00 17/11/28/2 Regular 17-11-68 Karachi/ ' Group-IV Mth(s)- Sind Urban 3 Asif Ali Sr.Executive/ 01-07-00 08/01/28/2 Regular 08-01-68 Karachi/ Durrani Group-IV Mth(s) Sindh Urban 4 Syed Muharrtmad Sr.Executive/ 01-07-00 02/01/27/2 Regular 02-01-67 Karachi/ Taha Group-IV Mth(s) Sindh Urban 5 Shahid lqbal Manager HSE/ 21-08-00 31/05/14/I. Regular 31-05-54 Lahore/ Malik Group-IV Mth(s) Punjab 6 Salman Shah Trainee Exec. HSE/ 01-09-00 20/08/24/0 Regular 204)&64 Karachi/ Group-V Mth(s) Sindh Urban 7 Wajahat Ali Management Trainee/ 01106-00 23/06/36/3 Regular 23-06-76 Islamabad/ Syed Group-VI Mth(s) Punjab 8 Irteza Siddique Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 29/05/33/3 Regular 29-05-73 Abbottabad/ Group-VI Mth(s) Punjab 9 Majid Saeed Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 10/02/36/3 Regular 10-02-76 Sialkot/ Group-VI Mth(s) Punjab 10 Shahmat Sultan- Management Trainee/ 91-06-00 18/02/36/3 Regular 18-02-76 Czjrat/ -al-Mahmood Group-VI Mth(s) Nnjab Sr. No, Name of the Officer Name of the. Post/Designation with Management Grade/ Management Position Date of Posting Date of Superannua- tionfTenure of Employment Terms and Conditions of Employment Date of Birth Place of Birth/
---
## Page 3
Province of Domicile II Mnan Ahmad Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 16/04/38/3 Regular 16-04-74 . Islamabad/ Group-VI Mth(s) Punjab 12 Syed Azfar Traineer Engineer/ 01-06-00 08/09/34/3 Regular 08-09-74 Karachi/ Yazdani Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 13 Benaifer 1. Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 03/01/37/3 Regular 03-01-77 Karachi/ Randeria Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 14 Humaira Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 03/01/38/3 Regular 03-01-78 Karachi/ Rasool Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 15 Marium Khan Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 - 07/07/37/3 Regular 07-07-77 Karachi/ Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 16 Abdul Ahad Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 20/05/37/3 Regular 20-05-77 Karachi/ Wahedna Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 17 Haider Rahat Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 06/01/36/3 Regular 06-01-76 Karachi/ Saeed Group-V1 Mth(s) Sindh Urban 18 Safdar Ghani Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 06/06/36/3 Regular 06-06-76 Karachi/ Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban .19 Huzefa Hazari Management Trainee! 01-06-00 07/07/36/3 Regular 07-07-76 Karachi/ Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 20 Aneeza Haider Management Trainee/ 05-06-00 09/11/35/3 Regular 09-11-75 Lahore/ Group-VI Mth(s) Punjab 21 Roomana Aziz Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 28/08/37/3 Regular 28-08-77 Karachi/ Khan Group-VI Mth(s) Sindh Urban 22 Raja Muhammad Management Trainee/ 01-06-00 07/12/37/3 Regular 07-12-77 Karachi/ Faisal Group-VI Mth(s) Punjab 23 Malik Amir Trainee Engineer/ 05-06-00 02/12/34/3 Regular 02-12-74 Punjab Abbas Group-VI Mth(s) Sr. No, Name of the Officer Name of the Post/Designation with Management Grade! Management Position Date of Posting Date of Superannua- tion/Tenure of Employment Terms and Conditions of Employment Date of Birth Place of Birth/ Province of Domicile 24 Wasif Sheikh Farooq Management Trainee/ Group-VI 21-08-00 15/06/36/2 Mth(s) Regular 15-06476 Islamabad/ Punjab 25 Arif Abdul ,Qayyum Management Trainee/ Group-VI 07-08-00 28/07/31/1 Mth(s) Regular 28-07- 71 Karachi/ Sindh Urban 26 Muhammad Zubair Khan Management Trainee/ Group-VI 21-08-00 07/12/34/1 Mth(s) Regular 07-12-74 Haripur/ Punjab 27 Muhammad Afzal Malik Management Trainee/ Group-VI 21-08-00 05/01/34/1 Mth(s) Regular 05-01-74 Sialkot/
---
## Page 4
Punjab 28 Sarmad Hussain Khan Management Trainee/ Group-V1 21-08-00 13/10/34/1 Mth(s) Regular 3-10-74 Budapest!, N.-W.F.P. 29 Moeez Ahmed Khan Management Trainee/ Group-VI 21-08-00 24/04/35i1 Mth(s) Regular 24-04-75 Kharian/ Punjab 30 Tariq All Korejo. Management Trainee Group-VI 21-08-00 08/05/37/1 Mth(s) Regiiiar 08-05-77 Karachi/ ..Sindh-Urban 31 Kan Alunad Management Trainee/ Group-VI 01-09-00 01/12/28/0 Mth(s) Regular 01-12-68 Lahore/ Punjab 32 Mohsin All Mangi Management Trainee/ . Group-VI 01-09-00 03/12/37/0 Mth(s) Regular 03-12-77 Islamabad Sindh Rural 4. During the course of arguments it was also submitted that the following persons were appointed in the P.S.O. After termination of the services of the petitioners/employees: Sr.No, Name Designation 1. Adnan Khan s/o Mushtaque Khan G.M. Aviation Sr.No, Name Designation Adnan Azamatullah s/o Azmatullah Khan G.M. Aviation Idrees Rana s/o Rana Bashir Confidential Secretaries to M.D. Rashid Waris Purchase Officer Mian Shakeel Depot Officer 6. Asim Naqvi s/o Qasim Naqvi Senior Executive Consumer Zafar Ashfaque Construction Engineer Kamran Construction Engineer Sajid Channa Humayoon Tarar Raja, Khizar Consumer Sale Labour Haq Nawaz Soomro Audit Officer Ismail Kodpur Larkana Sales Officer {{TABLE}} 5. The General Manager, P.S.O. Was present in Court. Raja Haq Nawaz, learned Advocate Supreme Court was confronted with the above documents. After seeking instructions from the General Manager, the learned Advocate Supreme Court did not dispute the appointments of the above persons but argued that they were appointed on merit pursuant to the regular advertisements issued by the Corporation. 6. When faced with this, Raja Haq Nawaz stated that all the appellants are not regular employees in that some of them were trainees and others were probationers. Be that as it may, even in case of a trainee or a probationer, if his services are terminated on grounds of mala fide in law or fact, they are entitled to show-cause notices not on the basis of principles of natural justice but on the ground that the authority concerned has abused the power vested in it. Their cases are, therefore, also at par with others. He has taken great pains in preparing a chart giving brief particulars of the cases and the grounds urged therein The Chart reads as follows:
---
## Page 5
{{TABLE}} 1. Contractual IMmloyees/Management Trainees of Pakistan State Oil. I laq Nay.Az Khan with Ch. Akhtar Ali, A.0 It #TBS S3DIA2I3S 'h AID #TBE #TBS 19-9-1997 I Appeal No, 22(P)198 _ 2-2-1998. #TBE #TBS 10-4-1999 1 Principles of natural Contract Service Limitation #TBE #TBS 19-8-1998 #TBE #TBS 1-8-1996 #TBE #TBS 26-4-1995 I 20-9-1997 #TBE #TBS 14-9-1995 1(1-9-1996 #TBE #TBS 15-5-1998 #TBE #TBS I 1997- 317(R)/98 #TBE #TBS 27-3-1995 20-8- I Appeal No, - 19-8-1998 #TBE #TBS Principles of Natural Justice grossly violated relying on the 1994 SCMR 2232 Anisa Rehrnan's case. Limitation period of appeals Appointment on political considerations and, without any merit. #TBE #TBS Points involved #TBE #TBS 2-2-1998 #TBE #TBS 22-9-1996 I 21(P)/98 #TBE #TBS 17-10-1994 : 19-9-1997 I Appeal No 19-8-1998 #TBE #TBS nation #TBE #TBS Date of Date of FST Appeal. Date of Induction Termi- No, order #TBE #TBS CA 1796/98 M/s. Pakistan Out of State Oil Co. CPLA 1267/ Ltd. v. 98 , Muhammad Tahir Khan and 2 others CA 1797/98 M/s. Pakistan out of State Oil Co Ltd #TBE #TBS 1268/98 #TBE #TBS ! v. M/s. Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. #TBE #TBS others A. 378/99 Ishfaq Hussain #TBE #TBS others CA 1798/98 I M/s. Pakistan Out of I State Oil Co Ltd CPLA I v. Syed All 1269/98 I Naqi Shah and 2 #TBE #TBS Farmanullah Khan and 2 #TBE #TBS CPLA and another v. #TBE #TBS S.No Case No, Title #TBE Sh. Riazul Haq with Mr. M.A. Zaidi, A.O.R. #TBS 19-9-1997 I #TBE #TBS nation I . .. #TBE #TBS Termi- . I Appeal No order #TBE #TBS Date of I FST Date of #TBE #TBS S.No Case No, / Title #TBE Date of Induction 5. I CA 388/99 Fazle Mansoor I 8-8-1995
---
## Page 6
Out of 10-2-1996 CPLA 1483/ 98 .. Points involved 298(P)/98 4-11-1998 I Departmental appeal dt. 2-10-1997 was. Filed and also filed W.P. 25-9-1998 I -No, 1889/1997 in the Peshawar H.C. On 36-12-1997: which was. I withdrawn on 23-9- 1998 (pg. 25). It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause #TBS SaDIAIMS IIAID #TBE #TBS 20-8-1997 300(P)/98 I 4-11-1998 25-9-1998 #TBE #TBS 25-8-1995 #TBE #TBS I CA 390/99 ' I Nasir All Khan Out of CPLA 1485/98 16-2-1998 #TBE #TBS I CPLA 1484/98 16-2-1998 #TBE #TBS Out of '661 #TBE #TBS CA 389/99 Muhammad 10-2-1996 #TBE #TBS S.No #TBE #TBS 16-2-1998 #TBE #TBS nation #TBE #TBS Induction Termi- #TBE #TBS Case No, Title Date of Date of #TBE #TBS Syed Raza Shah 6-7-1995 #TBE #TBS CA 391/99 Out of CPLA 1486/ 98 16-2-1998 #TBE #TBS FST Date of Points involved Appeal No, order #TBE #TBS 25-9-1998 . No, 1615/1997 in the Peshawar H.C. On 3-10-1997; which was withdrawn on 23-9-1998 (pg. 23). It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. I I). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 3 of judgment. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice #TBE #TBS 1 20-8-1997;302(P)/98 1 4-11-1998 Departmental appeal di. 2-9-1997 was filed and also filed W.P. #TBE #TBS Departmental appeal dt. 2-9-1997 was filed and also filed W.P. No, 1614/1997 in the Peshawar H.C. On 3-10-1997; which was withdrawn on 23-9-1998 (pg. 18). It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 10). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 3 of judgment Limitation - Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. #TBE #TBS withdrawn on 23-9-1998 (pg. 23). It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 10)._ Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 3 of judgment. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. #TBE
---
## Page 7
#TBS 25-9-1998 No, 1623/1997 in the Peshawar H.C. On 8-10-1997; which was #TBE #TBS 27-8-1997 299(P)/98 4-11-1998 I Departmental appeal dt. 2-9-1997 was filed and also filed W.P. #TBE #TBS - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. #TBE #TBS notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 10). Appeals . Hopelessly time-barred. Para. 3 - pgs. 6-8 - Limitation -- Principle of natural justice #TBE #TBS S.No Case No, Title #TBE Date of Date of Induction Termi- nation CA 392/99 Matiullah Khan 20-10-1994 20-8-1997 Out of CPLA 1487/98 1 16-2-1998 10. 1 CA 393/99 I Arbab 14-9-1995 20-8-1997 Out of Najibullah CPLA 1488/98 16-2-1998 Mr. Abdul Hafeez Lakho with Mr. K.A. Wahab, A.Q.R. FST Date of Points involved Appeal No, order - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. 304(P)/98 4-11-1998 Departmental appeal dt. 13-10-1997 - No writ filed. 26-9-1998 It was challenged before FST on the ground that no sluiw-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 10). Dept. Appeal and Service appeal both are time-barred. Appeals hopelessly time. Barred. Para. 3 of judgment. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice - No show'-cause notice hence condemned unheard 305 (P)/98 4-11-1998 I Departmental appeal dt. 2-9-1997 was filed and also filed W.P... 25-9-1998 No: 1587/1997 in the Peshawar High Court which was withdrawn on 23-9-1998 (Page 24). It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show cause notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 10). Dept.. Appeal and Service appeal both are time barred. Appeals hopelessly time barred. Para 3 of judgment. - Limitation -2- Principle of natural justice - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. #TBS IJ O #TBE #TBS Date of Induction 15-12-1994 ' #TBE #TBS Date of 1 FST Termi- I Appeal No, nation -4 19-9-1997 I 790(K)/98 8-6-1998 #TBE #TBS 11. CPLA 23- Allah Dino K/ 99 1 Mirani #TBE #TBS Case No, Title #TBE #TBS S.No #TBE
---
## Page 8
Date of j Points involved order Departmental appeal dt. 18-10-1997 was filed and also Civil Suit 17-10-98 No, 1357/1997 (p. 52) in the Sindh H.C. On 11-10-1997. It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg.29). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs.25 and 27. Limitation - Principle of natural justice #TBS 15-9-1994 1-3.1996 #TBE #TBS Date of Induction #TBE Points involved #TBS 8-6-1998 1 #TBE #TBS 1 19-9-1997 1 791(K)/98 11 17-10-98 #TBE #TBS 1C1 99 1 Mahesar #TBE #TBS 12. I CPLA 24- 1 Shafaqat H. #TBE - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard Departmental appeal dt. 18-10-1997 was tiled and also Civil Suit No, 1357/1997 (p. 52) in the Sindh H.0 on 11-10-1997. It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg.30). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard #TBS 1-3-1996 #TBE #TBS .1 IC/ 99 1 Sahito #TBE #TBS I CPLA 25-. - Sikandar All #TBE 19-9-1997 I 812(K)/98 17-10-98 Departmental appeal dt. 20-10-1997 was filed with Secretary 12-6-1998 M/Petroleurn, and also Civil Suit No, 1355/1997 in the Sindh H.C. On 13-10-1997. It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg. 30). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard #TBS K/ 99 Bajkani #TBE #TBS 14. CPLA 26- Shah Dost 8-8-1990 #TBE 119-9-1997 813(K)/98 1 17-10-98 Departmental appeal dt. Was fileckand also Civil Suit 1 1 12-6-1998 No, 1216/1997 in the Sindh H.C. On 27-9-1997. Judgment of HC dt. 12-3-1998, pg. 62 It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given-hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg. 30). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. #TBS S3DIANgS IIAID #TBE #TBS CPLA 29- I Muhammad j 1-11-1996 K/ 99 Siddique Mirani #TBE #TBS CPLA 28- I Shabbir Ahmed j 2-5-1990 K/ 99, I Samejo #TBE #TBS 15. CPLA 27- Abdul Jabbar K/ 99 Jamali #TBE
---
## Page 9
#TBS S.No Case No, #TBE #TBS Title #TBE #TBS 20-9-1997 #TBE #TBS - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard 920(K)/98 I 17-10-98 Departmental appeal dt. 20-10-1997 was filed and also Civil Suit 16-6-1998 No, 1357/1997 in the Sindh H.C. Oh 11-10-1997. Judgment of HC dt. 5-6-1998 p. 62 It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause #TBE #TBS It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg. 301 Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. Limitation --- Principle of natural justice #TBE #TBS 19-9-1997 3 815(K)/98 17-10-98. Departmental appeal dt. - was filed and also Civil Suit 12-6- 1998 I No, 1355/1997 in the Sindh H.C. On 13-10-1997 Judgment of HC dt. 5-6-1998 p. 68 #TBE #TBS 17-10-98 Departmental appeal dt. Was filed and also Civil Suit No, 1355/1997 in the Sindli H.C. On 13-10-1997. Judgment of HC dt. 5-6-1998, ph. 57 It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation (pg. 30). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. Limitation Principle of natural justice --- No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard #TBE #TBS Limitation - Principle of natural justice - No show-cause-notice hence condemned unheard #TBE #TBS Date of Date of FST Date of Points involved Induction Termi- Appeal No, order nation #TBE #TBS SThDIAllgS 1IAID #TBE #TBS K/ 99 I Khoro #TBE #TBS - 18. I CPLA 30- I Neor Mustafa 8-7-1990. #TBE #TBS K/ 99 Shaikh #TBE #TBS CPLA 32- irshad Ali 1-7-1990 #TBE #TBS K/ 99 Memon #TBE #TBS : CPLA 31- #TBE #TBS Irfan Ahmed # 10-6-1990 19-9-1997 #TBE #TBS 19-9-1997 238(K)/98 17-10-98 Departmental appeal dt. 18-10-1997 was tiled and also Civil Suit 18-3-1998 #TBE #TBS 1 dt. 12-3-1998 p. 58 1 It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg. 30). I Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard #TBE #TBS I -4- 237(K)/98 17-10-98 Departmental appeal dt. 20-10-1997 was filed and also Civil Suit 18-3-1998 1 No, 1216/1997 in the Sindh 11.C. On 27-9-1997. Judgment of HC #TBE #TBS HC dt. 5-6-1998,pg. 62
---
## Page 10
It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg. 30). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs: 26 and 28. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard #TBE #TBS 19-91997 816(K)/98 17-10298 .Depanmental appeal dt. Was filed and also Civil Suit 12-6-1998 I - No, 1355/1997 in the Sindh H.C. On 13-10-1997. Judgment of #TBE #TBS notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. (pg, 30). Appeals hopelessly time- barred. Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 and 28. - Limitation Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard #TBE #TBS Points involved #TBE #TBS S.No I Case No, Title #TBE #TBS FST Date of Appeal No, order #TBE #TBS nation #TBE #TBS Date of Date of Induction Termi- #TBE #TBS SRDIAllgS 'HAD #TBE S.No Case No, Title Date of Induction I Date of Termi- nation FST 1 Date of ; Points involved Appeal No, I order I I No, 1216/1997 in the Sindtal.C. On 29-9-1997. Judgment of FIC I I dt. 12-3-1998 p. 57 I I It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause . I I notice given hence condemned unheard and of limitation. . I (pg.30). : 1 Appeals hopelessly time-barred Para. 10 of judgment at pgs. 26 I 1 -and28- l..Imitation. . I - Principle of natural justice . . I - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard Mr. Fateh Muhammad Khan, A.O.R. Peshwar S.No 21. 1 Case No, I . i CPLA 1707/98 11-1-99 ! I I 1 I I Title I ' ' 1... . I 1 Zafar Ali Arbab I I i I I I Date of I Induction 11-5-1994 19-5-1994 i 1 1.. 1 I 1
---
## Page 11
1 I 1 I 1 Date of Termi- nation 19-9-1997 I FST . IAppeal No, I 301(P)/98 ' 25-9-1998 I I I i 1 i 3 I i ! Date of order 4-11-98 I Points involved I I Departmental appeal di 8-10-1997 - No writ filed. I It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause I notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 10). Dept. Appeal ,1 & Service appeal both are time barred. Appeals hopelessly timebarred. Para 3 of judgment. . I I - Not given due consideration to the condonation application. i ! - Due to ambiguity of forum and financial constraints could not I approach the FST in time.. 1 - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. {pg. 4) I - Principle of natural justice Sh. Riazul Hag with Mr. M. A. Zaidi, A.O.R. #TBS SADIAllaS #TBE #TBS Points involved Departmental 'appeal dt. 13.10.1997 - No writ filed. It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. (pg. 9). Dept. Appeal and Service appeal both are time-barred. Appeals hopelessly time-barred Para. 3 of judgment. - Limitation - Principle of natural justice -No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. #TBE #TBS Title Anwar Ilayat #TBE #TBS 10-10-1998 #TBE #TBS Date of Date of I FST Date of Induction ITermi- Appeal order nation jL No 15-7-1996 1 27-8-1997 839(R)198 4-11,1998 #TBE #TBS S.No Case No 22. CPLA 75/99 16-1-99 #TBE Meher Khan Malik, A.O.R. #TBS Points involved #TBE #TBS S.No Case No, Title #TBE #TBS . I 23. COLA 752/ 1 Dr. Anwar Ali . I . 99 1 Sahto . I . #TBE
---
## Page 12
#TBS Date of 1 Date of I FST Appeal Date of Induction 1 Termi- : No, .1 order nation -). , #TBE Sh. Riazul Hag with Mr. M. A. Zaidi, A.O.R. #TBS S. No 24. #TBE Case No, : Title Date of 1 Date of I FST Appeal ! Date of Induction I Termi- No I order nation . i CPLA 947/ I Muhammad 1-9-1994 I 19-9-1997 996(L)/98 1 10-4-1999 99 I Sibtain Matti I . 6-8-1998 ! 6-6-1996 25-5-99 1 . . I . . I Points involved Departmental appeal dt. 15.7.97 was filed and also W.P. No, 7691/1997 )n the Lahore H.C. It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. Discrimination [by PSO]. (pg. 24). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Paras 9-11 of judgment pg. 19 #TBS SaDIAIIHS 'lIAID #TBE #TBS 19-9-1997 #TBE #TBS 25: CPLA M. Wan Sharif 21-9-1994 948/99 I 16-10-1995 25-5-99 #TBE #TBS 19-9-1997 1 1442(L)/98 I 7-8-1998 #TBE #TBS 25-5-99 #TBE #TBS 26 CPLA Khalid Aslam 21-9-1994 I 19-9-1997 949/99 I 16-10-1995 #TBE #TBS 10-4-1999 It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. Discrimination [pick and choose] by PSO. (pg. 23). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Paras. 9-11 of judgment pg 19 - Limitation - Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. #TBE #TBS It was challenged before FST on the ground tlfai no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. Discrimination [pick and choose) by PSO. (pg. 22). Appeals hopelessly time- barred. Paras. 9-11 of judgment, pg. 19 - Limitation . ' - Principle of natural justice No show-cause notice-hence condemned unheard. - Discriminatory treatment by management. #TBE #TBS Limitation - Principle of natural justice - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. - Discriminatory treatment by management. 775(L)/98 10-4-1999 I Departmental appeal dt. 6-10-1997 was tiled and also W.P. No, 16.-7-1998 I 22652/1997 in the Lahore H.C. It was challingedbefore FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. Discrimination [pick and choose] by PSO. (pg. 23). Appeals hopelessly time-barred. Paras. 9-11 of judgment, pg. 19
---
## Page 13
Limitation Principle of natural justice - No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. - Discriminatorltreatment by management. 774(L)/98 10-4-1998 Departmental appeal dt. 9-10-1997 was filed and also W:P. No, 16-7-1998 22493/1997 in the Lahore.H.C. On . #TBE #TBS Induction Termi- No, order nation #TBE #TBS S.No Case No, Tide Date of Date of FS1 Appeal , Date of Points involved #TBE #TBS 27. CPLA 950/99 25-5-99 Malik Ahsan Qadeer 214-1994 30-5-1995 #TBE #TBS SgDIAISS #TBE #TBS Points involved #TBE #TBS It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. Discrimination [pick and #TBE #TBS No show-cause notice hence condemned unheard. 10-4-1999 Departmental appe al dt. 30-9-1997 was filed (pg. 31) #TBE #TBS It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned unheard. Discrimination [pick and. Choose] by PSO. (pg. 23). Appeals hopelessly time- barred. Paras.9-11 of judgment. Pg. 20 . - Limitation . Principle of natural justice #TBE #TBS 134I(1)/98 1 104-1999 Departmental appeal dt. 2-9-1997 was filed (pg. 39) and also W.P. 12-8-1998 No, 2206/1997 in the Lahore H.C. Rwp #TBE #TBS It was challenged before FST on the ground that no show-cause notice given hence condemned…
Read the unabridged text and precedent citation network on Al Wakeelo Legal Research Platform.