Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1970 PLC 83
Court: Commissioner For Workmen's Compensation
Year: 1966
Decision Date: 1966-03-26
Parties: Workmen's Compensation And Authority Under Payment Of Wages Act, Lahore Division, Lahore AZIM KHAN AND 35 Other vs ISMAILJEE & SONS STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS, LAHORE
Case cited as 1970 PLC 83
Court Name: Commissioner For Workmen's Compensation Judge(s): Mian Nisar Ahmad Saleem Title:Workmen's Compensation And Authority Under Payment Of Wages Act, Lahore Division, Lahore AZIM KHAN AND 35 Other vs ISMAILJEE & SONS STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS, LAHORE Case No.: Date of Judgment:1966-03-26 Reported As: 1970 PLC 83 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER Azim Khan and 35 others have filed this application under the Payment of Wages Act, stating that they had been suspended from service without any notice. They have not mentioned the value of the relief sought by them in the plaint in column No. 4 of the application. There are only two thumb- impressions and one signature on the application, and on the list of the applicants, attached with the plaint, only Azim Khan has put his thumb-- impression. Although Azim Khan was not legally authorised to represent 35 claimants, my predecessor admitted the application and issued notice to the respondent. Column No. 5(a) of the application has also been left blank and no delayed wages have been claimed. On 10-1-1966 both parties appeared before the Court and stated that they bad decided to arrive at a compromise and they undertook to file a written agreement with the Court. On 17-1-1966 only 5 workers were present in the Court, and they stated that they had received their dues from the respondent. On 18-1-1966 a written agreement bearing thumb- impressions 'of 27 workers was filed with the Court in which they stated that they had received their…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.