Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

SADEK ALI vs CHHATAK CEMENT FACTORY, E. P. I. D. C., SYLHET. — 1971 PLC 562

Citation: 1971 PLC 562

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-12-31

Parties: SADEK ALI vs CHHATAK CEMENT FACTORY, E. P. I. D. C., SYLHET.

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 562

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title: SADEK ALI vs CHHATAK CEMENT FACTORY, E. P. I. D. C., SYLHET. Case No.: Complaint Case No. 112 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-12-31 Reported As: 1971 PLC 562 Result: N/A Judgment AWARD MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN).-Sadek Ali is the petitioner. He alleges that he was in the - service of Chhatak Cement Factory for about 9 years. He was served with 2 charge-sheets on flimsy grounds, but there was no proper enquiry on the charge-sheets. He- was, however, ultimately dismissed from service on 31-12-69. At the time of his dismissal he was getting Rs. 155'00 per month as pay. Against the order of dismissal i.e. submitted a grievance petition. But the administration refused to consider his grievances. So, he new filed this application under sec--tion 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Stand--ing Orders) Act, 1965 for re-instatement -in his service with all back wages. The second-party by a written objection contended that the petitioner was justly charge-sheeted and some of the charges have been proved against him on proper enquiry. The petitioner has been found guilty of misconduct and he has been rightly dismissed from service and he is not entitled to any relief in this case. Member Mr. Sabur has suggested for re-instatement of the petitioner in service, while the other member Mr. Meerza is of the opinion that the petitioner has been rightly dismissed. What I find from the perusal of…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.