ABDUL HASHEM vs MESSRS BUX RUBBER INDUSTRIES — 1970 PLC 856

Citation: 1970 PLC 856

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1969

Decision Date: 1969-12-31

Parties: ABDUL HASHEM vs MESSRS BUX RUBBER INDUSTRIES, DACCA

Headnotes

Result: case, according Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under section 25(1)(b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: ABDUL HASHEM vs MESSRS BUX RUBBER INDUSTRIES, DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 86 of 1969 Date of Judgment:- Reported As: 1970 PLC 856 Result: case, according Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under section 25(1)(b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The case of the first party is that he was a permanent worker as tailor under the second party since long. But the second party terminated his services, with effect from 26-2- 69 after telling him verbally at 5 p.m. on 25-2-69. He was not given any termination benefits. His grievance notice sent to the second party on the following day under registered cover was not replied to. Hence this petition for termination benefits. The second party filed written statement wherein 'the allegations of the first patty were denied. It was contended that there was never any case of dismissal of any worker in the factory during the long period of 5/6 years. The first party served under the second party, but at one time voluntarily left. He had the habit of long absence and thus he used to case employment. The second party gave him employment a several times while he returned back from his long absence. He dis-- appeared on 8-3-68 and thereafter again came for employment on 14-10-68 when he 'was re- employed again. At the time of his so-called…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.