ABDUL KUDDUS AKAN DA vs THE STATE Case No — 1970 PCRLJ 520

Citation: 1970 PCRLJ 520

Court: Dacca

Year: 1969

Decision Date: 1969-12-31

Parties: ABDUL KUDDUS AKAN DA vs THE STATE

Headnotes

520 Result: Appeal allowed JUDGMENT JUDGMENT This appeal arises out of judgment passed by M. Chowdhury, Additional Sessions Judge and Ex-Officio Special Judge, Faridpur, convicting the accused-appellant Abdul Kuddus Akond under section 161, Pakistan Penal Code and section 5 (2) of Act 11 of 1947 and sentencing him to suffer simple imprison--ment for three months and to a fine of Rs.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Dacca Judge(s): Abdullah Jabir Title: ABDUL KUDDUS AKAN DA vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 1967 Date of Judgment:- Reported As: 1970 P Cr. L J 520 Result: Appeal allowed JUDGMENT JUDGMENT This appeal arises out of judgment passed by M. M. J. Chowdhury, Additional Sessions Judge and Ex-Officio Special Judge, Faridpur, convicting the accused-appellant Abdul Kuddus Akond under section 161, Pakistan Penal Code and section 5 (2) of Act 11 of 1947 and sentencing him to suffer simple imprison--ment for three months and to a fine of Rs. 500, in default to rigorous imprisonment for three months under section 161, Pakistan Penal Code, no separate sentence having been passed under section 5(2) of Act II of 1947. The prosecution case is that P. W. 1 Abdul Kader Khan was a dealer and miller of food grains at Lavikhola under P. S. Zanjira and carried on his business under Sub-Divisional Food Office of Madaripur and the appellant was the Head Clerk of Madariput Sub-Divisional Food Office in 1965. On 28-9-65 P. W. 1 went to the Sub-Divisional Food Office to ascertain the allotment of rice and wheat etc. In his name when the appellant asked him to produce all his account books and registers for his inspection. On 6-10-65 P. W. 1 produced his account books before the appellant and on 13-10-65 he, again went to him to take back his account books after making necessary deposit of money for allotment of food grains in his favour when the appellant threaten--ed him…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.