TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF TEXTILES vs LABOUR COURT, JULLUNDUR AND — 1970 PLC 603

Citation: 1970 PLC 603

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Year: 1969

Decision Date: 1969-12-31

Parties: TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF TEXTILES vs LABOUR COURT, JULLUNDUR AND JUDGMENT

Headnotes

Case cited as 1970 PLC 603

Judgment Text

Court Name: Punjab and Haryana High Court Judge(s): R. S. Narula Title:TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF TEXTILES vs LABOUR COURT, JULLUNDUR AND JUDGMENT Reported As: 1970 PLC 603 Result: petition is allowed Judgment JUDGMENT The effect, construction and true scope of the expression "for reasons td be stated therein" occurring in subsection (1) of section 33-B of the Industrial Disputes Act (XIV of 1947) (as, subsequently amended), hereinafter referred to as the Act, calls for decision in this petition under. Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution filed by the Management of the Technological Institute' of Textiles, Bhiwani, for quashing the award of the Labour Court, Jullundur, dated 2nd January 1965 (Annexure `N'), directing the re-instatement of Hanuman Prasad Seni (hereinafter called the employee), respondent No. 3, in the service of the petitioner, and further directing payment of back wages to him. The employee joined the service of the petitioner on 6th June 1957. In the appointment letter issued to the employee (Exb. M-2 before the Labour Court), it was specifically stated that his employment was subject to notice of one calendar month from either side., Under rule 13(1) of the certified standing orders in respect of the petitioner Institute it is laid down that the employment of any permanent workman, whether time-rated or piece-rated, may be terminated by thirteen days' notice or by payment of thirteen days wages in lieu thereof by either side. The employee contracted…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.