Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1970 PLC 208
Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal
Year: 1969
Decision Date: 1969-09-13
Parties: MESSRS VALIKA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI AND ANOTHER vs VALIKA TEXTILE MILLS EMPLOYEES' UNION
Case cited as 1970 PLC 208
Court Name: Industrial Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Inamullah Khan Title:MESSRS VALIKA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI AND ANOTHER vs VALIKA TEXTILE MILLS EMPLOYEES' UNION Case No.: Date of Judgment:1969-09-13 Reported As: 1970 PLC 208 Result: application made Judgment ORDER These are two applications under Order XLVII, rule 1, of Tribunal The Civil Procedure Code for review of my order dated 21st June 1969. I disposed of two appeals by a common order dated 21 June 1969, as they arose out of as award given by the industrial Court. Of the two appeals that I disposed of by the said Order one was filed by Messrs Valika Textile Mills Limited, and the other by Messrs Valika Woollen Mills Company Limited. The learned Industrial Court by its order had ordered the reinstate--ment of 11 of the Workmen of Messrs Valika Textile Mills Ltd., and 5 of the Valika Woollen Mills Company Limited. Imaintained that order. 2.The scope of review is very limited. It is not a substitute for appeal. The application for review lies if a pest discovers a new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was pas or order made, or on account of same mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, or for any other sufficient reason. He may in these circumstances apply for a review o judgment to the Court which passed the decree or made the order The application for review thus would…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.