Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PLC 118
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-07-06
Parties: MD. FALIK ALI vs CHHATTAK CEMENT FACTORY, EPIDC, SYLHET
Case cited as 1971 PLC 118
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title: MD. FALIK ALI vs CHHATTAK CEMENT FACTORY, EPIDC, SYLHET Case No.: Complaint Case No. 73 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-07-06 Reported As: 1971 PLC 118 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN). This is an application under section 25 of the Standing Orders Act by the petitioner for his, re-instatement in service alleging that he has been illegally discharged without proper enquiry on the allegation levelled against him. 2nd party on the other hand, maintains that there was a proper enquiry on the charges against him and the petitioner having been found guilty of misconduct has been dis--charged. Before entering into merit, I like to see if the application is in time. It appears that the petitioner submitted grievance petition by- his letter, dated 9-12-1969. A reply to that was received by the petitioner on 22-12-1969. That is the date given by the petitioner under his signature on the Acknowledg--ment Receipt. There seems td be postal seal, dated 23-12-1969. Even then the petitioner is not coming before Court within 30 days from the data of decision on his grievance petition, the present Application having been filed on 23-1-1970 the application being barred by limitation we are not in a position to look into the merit of the cast. It appears that there was a sort of enquiry and the petitioner was found guilty of misconduct. Mr. Meerza has opined that the case is barred by…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.