Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1973 PLC 163
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1971
Decision Date: 1971-12-12
Parties: Ch. MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM HALEEM vs DR. M. S. H. SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER
Case cited as 1973 PLC 163
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Khuda Bakhsh A. Kazi Title: Ch. MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM HALEEM vs DR. M. S. H. SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER Case No.: Date of Judgment:1971-12-12 Reported As: 1973 PLC 163 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER The above-named Complainant filed two separate complaints against the above-named Opponents in this Court. My learned predecessor without recording statement under section 200, Cr. P. C. directed that notice be issued for preliminary enquiry. Diving the pendency of this preliminary enquiry, Mr. A. R. Qazi, learned Representative for the Opponents made an application wherein he submitted the it the process against the Accused has been issued without examination of the Complainant under section 200, Cr, P. C. is these two cases, hence the, proceedings were illegal. Accordingly the process and the proceedings were liable to be quashed. He, therefore, prayed that the present proceedings be ordered to terminate at this stage of the case. Notice was given to the other side. Today I have heard the learned Representatives of the parties on this objection. At the very outset it is clear that In both the cases my learned predecessor had not recorded the statement of the Complainant under section 200, Cr. P. C. and instead had directed that a notice be issued for preliminary enquiry. Instead of issuing of notice, summonses had been issued against the Opponents by the office due to oversight. This is why the learned Representative for the Opponents thought that process…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.