Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1975 PLC 671
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1971
Decision Date: 1971-05-19
Parties: ABDUL HAMID vs PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE
Case cited as 1975 PLC 671
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s):Ch. Umar Din, Sardar Muhammad Amir Akbar Khan, Mushtaq Ahmad Karimi Title: ABDUL HAMID vs PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE Case No.: Petition No. 431 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1971-05-19 Reported As: 1975 PLC 671 Result:Petition No. 431/70 {ln re : Abdul Hamid v. Punjab Road Transport Corporation, Lahore) Petition No. Judgment ORDER Sardar Muhammad Amir Akbar Khan (Chairman).--This order will dispose of (hereinafter called the Ordinance) as common questions of facts and law are involved in them. The short facts necessary for the disposal of these petitions are that all the petitioners were permanent employees of the respondent who were retired on attaining the age of superannuation. All these petitioners have come up under Standing Order No. 18 of 196 < with a prayer that the respondent be directed to pay them one month's wages in lieu of notice of termination, pay in lieu of unavailed leave and gratuity. It was admitted at the time of arguments that the gratutity has been paid to each of workers and that each of them is entitled to pay in lieu of unavailed leave. The main contest on behalf of the respondent is that this Court has no jurisdiction to order payment of wages in lieu of one month's notice of termination and that none of the petitioners is entitled to notice wages as each one of them retired after attaining the age of superannuation. Since the facts are admitted no evidence was recorded. I would, therefore, first deal…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.