Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PCRLJ 732
Court: Dhaka High Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-12-31
Parties: MOJIBOR RAHMAN MULLICK Arts 2 Others vs TOBARAK MAJHI-Opposite- JUDGMENT
Case cited as 1971 PCRLJ 732
Court Name: Dhaka High Court Judge(s): A. M. Sayem Title:MOJIBOR RAHMAN MULLICK Arts 2 Others vs TOBARAK MAJHI-Opposite- JUDGMENT Reported As: 1971 P Cr. L J 732 Result: Rule is accordingly Judgment JUDGMENT This Rule was issued at the instance of Mojibar Rahman Mullick, Rahman Sardar and Sayed Ali Mullick, all of village Sonarang, P. S. Tangibari, within Munshiganj Sub-Division. By the impugned order, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Munshiganj directed his office (1) to draw up a proceeding under section 107, Cr. P. C. Asking them to show cause why they should not be ordered to execute a bond of Rs. 15,000 each with to local sureties of the like amount each, to maintain peace for the period of one year and (2) to issue warrants for their arrest. By the same order the learned Sub- Divisional Magistrate asked the Officer-in-Charge of Tangibari P. S. Immediately to seize their fire- arms. The last paragraph of the impugned order directs Mr. Hasham, a Magistrate of the Ist Class, to hold an inquiry on the spot regarding the desirability of cancellation of the petitioners' fire-arms. Mr. Ataur Rahman Khan appearing in support of the Rule, at the very outset, drew my attention to the first paragraph of the impugned order which runs as follows:- "Seen petition. Heard. I am satisfied that there is serious apprehension of breach of peace by the O. Ps." Mr. Ataur Rahman Khan next pointed out that although the very petition upon which the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate passed…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.