Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1972 PLC 361
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1971
Decision Date: 1971-08-03
Parties: PAINTEX LIMITED, LAHORE vs MUHAMMAD AZIM
Case cited as 1972 PLC 361
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s):Muhammad Mushtaq Karimi, Ch. Umar Din, Sardar Muhammad Amir Akbar Khan Title: PAINTEX LIMITED, LAHORE vs MUHAMMAD AZIM Case No.: Petition No. 1 of 1971 Petition No. 120 of 1971 Date of Judgment:1971-08-03 Reported As: 1972 PLC 361 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER SARDAR MUHAMMAD AMIR AKBAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN): This order shall dispose of Petition No. 1/71 In Re: Paintex Linited v. Muhammad Azim, Petition No. 2/71 In Re: Paintex Limited v. Munsif Khan and Petition No. 3/71 In Re: Paintex Limited v. Mukhtar Ahmad as common question of facts and law arise in them. The petitioners have filed these Petitions under section 47 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance of 1969 for permission of this Court to dismiss the respondents on the ground of misconduct. The permission is sought because Petition No. 52/70 filed under section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance by Paintex Limited against the union for adjudication if certain agreement arrived at between the parties was a valid agreement or not? The petitioner is doubtful whether the petition under section 34 mentioned above can be said to be a pending industrial dispute. He moved applications under section 47 of the I. R. O. For per--mission to dismiss the respondents as a matter of abundant caution that if the said petition under section 34 of the I. R. O. Is hold to be a pending industrial dispute, then permission would be necessary. We have held in Petition No. 120/71, Abdul Hamid v. Brooke Bond…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.