Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1970 PCRLJ 640
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 1969
Decision Date: 1969-10-03
Parties: GHULAM HAIDER vs The STATE
Case cited as 1970 PCRLJ 640
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Afzal Zullah Title: GHULAM HAIDER vs The STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5697 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1969-10-03 Reported As: 1970 P Cr. L J 640 Result: Bail allowed Judgment ORDER This is art application bad in a case registered under sections 326/307 rear) with 34, Y. P. C. Vide F. 1. R. (Annex. A). The learned counsel for tire petitioner hats raised the following contentions: - (i) that the opinion of the doctor in respect of the injury does not conclusively determine that it is grievous ; (ii) that no distance is mentioned in the F. I. R. Showing the range from which the shot was fired that the fact that only one pellet hit a person whir could not be made the target of the lire ,hot, in the circumstances of the case, shows that it was a in stray pellet which hit the injured person; and that it does not necessarily mean that the lire shot in fact was aimed at somebody; (iii) that even if the story disclosed in the F. 1. R. Is accepted, it shows that the injury wars caused as a result of sudden fight on a sudden quarrel with how premeditation ; and lastly (iv) that the f). S. P., who riot only supervised the investigation but also heard the witnesses produced by both the parties and also examined the record relevant to the previous litigation on the Ihata in dispute, has conic to the conclusion that the petitioner was riot present at the spot at the time of occurrence. In support of the last contention the…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.