Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, SUKKUR vs — 1970 PLC 96

Citation: 1970 PLC 96

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal

Year: 1969

Decision Date: 1969-06-11

Parties: THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, SUKKUR vs MUHAMMAD USMAN AND ANOTHER

Headnotes

Case cited as 1970 PLC 96

Judgment Text

Court Name: Industrial Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Inamullah Khan Title:THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, SUKKUR vs MUHAMMAD USMAN AND ANOTHER Case No.: Date of Judgment:1969-06-11 Reported As: 1970 PLC 96 Result: accordingly order Judgment ORDER This is an appeal under section 16 of the West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance. 1968 (hereinafter called the Ordinance), The learned Chairman of the Second "7eest Pakistan Industrial Court, Karachi, had ordered the re-instatement of the respondent with all back benefits on the ground that the respondent being a temporary Conductor could not be removed from service on the ground of misconduct, without being charge sheeted. 2. Mr. Sirajul Haq Qureshi, the learned Representative for the Government Transport Service, contended, relying on A. W. 1/1, that the respondent was only a badli. I have gone through A. W. 1/1. It clearly states that the respondent was on the waiting list and was temporarily appointed as a Conductor in place of Muhammad Isa, who was promoted as a Booking Clerk. It is true that A. W. 1/1, mentions that the services of the respondent could be terminated "as and when above `officials resume their duty on or before earlier without assigning any cause". The admitted position is that the services of the respon--dent were not terminated when Muhammad Isa reverted as Conductor. The respondent continued as temporary Conductor till 1st May 1968. It cannot, therefore, be said that the services of…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.