but in the present context the first case which is directly relevant is that of Qamar Din v. Zawar Hussain and others — 1964 PLD 185

Citation: 1964 PLD 185

Court: Lahore High Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-02-11

Parties: Ch. SARDAR ALI vs Ch. ALI MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER

Headnotes

In this case Muhammad lqbal, J. Came to the conclusion that "a non---claimant displaced person taking the benefit of such a notification.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Sheikh Anwarul Haq Title: Ch. SARDAR ALI vs Ch. ALI MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER Case No.: Writ Petition No. 2984/R of 1963 Date of Judgment:1970-02-11 Reported As: PLD 1970 Lahore 647 Result: Petitions accepted JUDGMENT JUDGMENT This judgment will dispose of Writ Petitions bearing Nos, 2984/R and 2985/R of 1963, as well as 534/R and 535/R of 1964 and 630/R of 1966, which involve similar questions of law and fact, and relate to different residential units of the same property, namely, House No. NE-I-K-157, situate on Grand Trunk Road, Lahore. The building is described by the petitioners as a Katri consisting of 20 or 25 residential units and they claim to be in possession of one unit each. All the petitioners, except Rehmat A.I in Writ Petition No. 534/R of 1964, had applied for the transfer of their portions on Forms NCH, whereas Rehmat A.I had made an application on Form LH as a local. No specific order was made by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner disposing of these forms, and instead the learned Assistant Settlement Commissioner only agreed with a note submitted to him by the Settlement Inspector on the 25th of February 1961, to the effect that this official had contacted the occupants of this property regarding the payment of the arrears of rent, and had found that only Messrs Nazir Ahmad, Mukhtar Ahmad, Tasleem Hussain, Ghulam Hussain, Ghulam Mustafa and Abdur Rahim had paid the rent. The Settlement Inspector had, therefore,…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.