Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1963 PLD 478
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-05-18
Parties: ABDUL AHAD vs THE STATE-the State
that imposition of such conditions while granting bail is not permissible under the law. Their Lordships in fact disagreed with the judgment in the case of Afadhukar Purshottam Nondkar v.
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Hayat Junejo Title: ABDUL AHAD vs THE STATE-the State Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No. 160 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-05-18 Reported As: 1970 P Cr. L J 1256 Result: Revision allowed Judgment ORDER The petitioner was arrested on 23-12-1969 on charge of theft of motor cars. He was challaned in five cases. He applied for bail in all the five cases and he was released by A. C. M. Court No. 24, Karachi. The amount of surety was fixed in the sum of Rs. 5,000.00 in each case. One of the conditions, however, was that this amount had to be deposited in cash. The petitioner thereafter, moved an application before the learned Sessions Judge, Karachi for reduction of the bail amount and to set aside the condition of cash deposit. The learned Sessions Judge declined the later request but reduced the cash amount to Rs. 2,000.00 in each case. Being aggrieved by this order dated 10-4-1970 of the learned Sessions Judge the petitioner has filed five bail applications, which 1 have treated as revision applications, and are being disposed of by this order. 2. It has been held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in the case of Vian Mahmud Ali Qasuri v. State (PLD 1963 SC 478), that imposition of such conditions while granting bail is not permissible under the law. Their Lordships in fact disagreed with the judgment in the case of Afadhukar Purshottam Nondkar v. Talab Haji Hussain (AIR. 1958 SC 376). Mr. Makhdum Sharif, the learned…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.