Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

NURUL ISLAM vs MESSRS NATIONAL METAL WORKS, DACCA — 1970 PLC 839

Citation: 1970 PLC 839

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-06-27

Parties: NURUL ISLAM vs MESSRS NATIONAL METAL WORKS, DACCA

Headnotes

Case cited as 1970 PLC 839

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, Nurul Islam Khan Title: NURUL ISLAM vs MESSRS NATIONAL METAL WORKS, DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 284 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1970-06-27 Reported As: 1970 PLC 839 Result: application is allowed in part Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under, section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The case of the first party is that he was appointed in the month of May, 1969 at a daily wage of. Rs.400. His services were verbally terminated on 27-8-69. He scat a grievance petition, but he received no reply. Hence the present application praying for re-instatement with back wages. The second party entered into appearance through their representative who verbally submitted that the first party was appointed on 26th May 1969 and was discharged on 11-8-69. His daily wage was Rs. 2.50. He was not a permanent worker, as he did not complete even 3 months' service. Point for determination in the present case is what relief, if any, the , first party is entitled to under the provisions of law? FINDINGS AND DECESION It appears from the evidence and circumstances of the case that both the appointment and discharge were verbal. The first party cannot produce any appointment letter or letter of discharge. It is admitted that there was no formal appointment letter. The first party cannot mention the date of his appointment…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.