ASID ALI vs CHHATAK CEMENT FACTORY, EPIDC, SYLHET — 1971 PLC 125

Citation: 1971 PLC 125

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-07-18

Parties: ASID ALI vs CHHATAK CEMENT FACTORY, EPIDC, SYLHET

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 125

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title: ASID ALI vs CHHATAK CEMENT FACTORY, EPIDC, SYLHET Case No.: Complaint Case No. 113 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-07-18 Reported As: 1971 PLC 125 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HTJDA (CHAIRMAN). This is application by Asid Ali praying for re-instatement in service under the second party, Chhatak Cement Factory under the Management of E.P.I.D.C. The petitioner was under the service of the 2nd party for about 11 years and he was getting monthly pay of Rs. 150 at the time of his removal from service. It is alleged that the petitioner was charge-sheeted, for two incidents but there was no proper impartial enquiry. One of the Enquiry Officers bore grudge against the petitioner. On the results of the so-called enquiry the petitioner was dismissed with effect from 24-12-1969. The petitioner then submitted a grievance petitioner, which was replied on 28-1-1970. 2nd party refused to withdraw the order of dismissal. So the petitioner has filed the case. The second party has filed written statement denying all the material allegations of the petitioner and contending that the petitioner was' charge-sheeted on two counts. On enquiry he had been found guilty of the charges and he has been rightly dismissed from service on the ground of misconduct. We have got to consider whether the dismissal of the peti--tioner is valid and proper. If not what benefit the petitioner is entitled to? It appears that…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.