A. Z. SIRAJ vs THE, CHIEF ENGINEER, IVAN MILUTIONOVIC-PIM, CHITTAGONG — 1971 PLC 122

Citation: 1971 PLC 122

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-07-06

Parties: A. Z. SIRAJ vs THE, CHIEF ENGINEER, IVAN MILUTIONOVIC-PIM, CHITTAGONG

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 122

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title: A. Z. SIRAJ vs THE, CHIEF ENGINEER, IVAN MILUTIONOVIC-PIM, CHITTAGONG Case No.: Date of Judgment:1970-07-06 Reported As: 1971 PLC 122 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN). A. Z. Siraj is the first party. The Chief Engineer, Ivan Milutinovic-Pim is the second party. It is the case of the first party that he was appointed a Mechanic on 26-5-1969 on probation under the second party and since then he has been working satisfactorily under the second party, but the service of the first party has been terminated frown 28-1-1970 without requisite notice or wages in lieu of notice as required under subsection (1) of section, 19 of the Standing Orders Act, 1965. The petitioner used to draw Rs. 400.00 per month. After the termination of his service the petitioner submitted a grievance petition. which was receive by the second party on 3-2-1970. But the second party did not reply 2o that. So, the petitioner has filed this application on 2-4-1970 for termination as provided by law. The second party contests the claims of the first party an in their written objection the second party wants to say that the first party is guilty of certain acts which amount to misconduct and there was a regular enquiry by which the petitioner has been found guilty of misconduct and he has been discharged from service. That being so, it is stated that the petitioner is not, entitle to any benefits except to…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.