Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Syed OBAIDUL HAQUE vs MESSRS OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA, — 1971 PLC 311

Citation: 1971 PLC 311

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-09-19

Parties: Syed OBAIDUL HAQUE vs MESSRS OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA,

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 311

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: Syed OBAIDUL HAQUE vs MESSRS OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA, Case No.: Complaint Case No. 381 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-09-19 Reported As: 1971 PLC 311 Result: N/A Judgment ORDBR MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an applica--tion under section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act; 1065; hereinafter referred to as the Act. The first party in the present case, was served with a termina--tion notice on 15-4-1970. But it is his case that he was not given overtime pay for 1,084 days and proper termination benefits and he has been thus illegally deprived of Rs. 23,745.23 for which he sent grievance notice to the second party. His prayer was rejected. Hence his application in Court for remedy. The second party contested the case denying the claim. He has been given termination benefits for 90 days and compensation at the rate of 14 days' wages for every completed year of service. His claim for overtime allowance, etc., is not admissible under sections 15 and 22 of the Payment of Wages Act. The whale petition has been misconceived. It should be dismissed. The matter was heard at length in presence of the members. It was then submitted that the first party was getting site allow--ance at the rate of 10 percent. and Rs. 50.00 as Medical Attend--ance Allowance and that this Rs. 84.00, his basic pay being Rs. 340.00, should be multiplied by three for giving…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.