Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 SHC 670
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Year of Decision: 2025
Decision Date: 2025-05-02
Parties: Aijaz Ali and others vs Mst. Shamul and others
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court on 2025-05-02, officially reported as 2025 SHC 670. In this matter between Aijaz Ali and others and Mst. Shamul and others, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
Case cited as 2025SHC670
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro Title: Aijaz Ali and others vs Mst. Shamul and others Case No.: Constitutional Petition No.S-469/2024 Date of Judgment:2025-05-02 Reported As: 2025 SHC 670 Result: Petition Disposed of
Judgment
ORDER Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro, J. Through this petition, the petitioners have challenged order dated 29- 11-2024 (the impugned order) passed by the Court of Learned Additional District Judge-II Kamber (Appellate Court) in Succession Appeal No 19 of 2024 Re Mst. Shamul Versus Shafiq ur Rehman and others, wherein the succession appeal filed by Respondent No 1 / MstShamulin respect of the Life Estate of her deceased husbandAbdul Ghaffar has beenallowed and moveable assets left by deceased Abdul Ghaffar have been ordered to be distributed amongst his three widows, minor son Shafiq ur Rehman and mother. 2. Facts giving cause for filing of the present petition are that Respondent No 1 (Mst. Shamul) filed succession petition before NADRA authority for grant of succession certificate under the provisions of Sindh Succession Act 2021, enabling her to collect share from moveable Life Estate of her husband Late Abdul Ghaffar who died on 11.10.2016 and left behind cash money and share certificateby purchase of shares in Allied Bank Limited and Habib Bank Limited. In charge Succession Facilitation Unit NADRA Kamber after verificationof record and inviting objections from public declined to grant succession certificate as one of the legal heirs of deceased was minor, thus advised legal heirs to approach Court of law. Mst Shamul filed succession appeal before the Court of Learned District Judge Kamber Shahdadkot which was assigned tothe Appellate Court. Mst Shamul claimed that her husband Abdul Ghaffar Chandio died on 11-10-2016 of natural death; he left behind three widows namely Mst Shamul, Mst Khanzadi, Mst Romana and son Shafiq ur Rehman as surviving legal heirs. Late Abdul Ghaffar died without making any will though diligent search was made but no will could be found.Late Abdul Ghaffar during his lifetime used to
---
## Page 2
purchase shares from Allied Bank Limited vide Folio No.26612 CDC share registrar services Karachi and Habib Bank Limited HBL folio No.19273 CDC share registrar services Karachi. Mst Shamul approached concerned NADRA authority for grant of succession certificate enabling her towithdraw said shares from concerned banks but NADRA did not issue succession certificate through order dated 06-04-2024 on the ground that subject case required adjudication by court of law.Hence, she filed succession Appeal making following prayer: "That, this Honorable Court may be pleased to issue succession certificate in favour of appellant regarding receiving/collecting shares from the Allied Bank Limited vide folio No.26612 CDC share register services Karachi and another bank account share certificate in Habib Bank Limited HBL folio No.19273 CDC share register services Karachi, left by deceased husband of appellant Abdul Ghaffar Chandio." 3. Appellate Court issued notices of the appeal to public at large through publication in daily Kawish dated 15-09-2024. Mst. Khanzadi and Mst Romana appeared before Appellate Court and filed an application under order 1 rule 10 CPC seeking indulgence of the Court to implead them as party, as they being widows of Late Abdul Ghaffar were also legal heirs. Application of Mst. Khanzadi and Mst Romana was allowed and they were arrayed as respondents in the appeal. Petitioners also filed an application under order 1 rule 10 CPC before Appellate Court to implead them as party, the application of petitioners was declined vide order dated 22-11-2024. Appellate Court called reports from the concerned Banks, which established the claim of Mst Shamul regarding investments by Late Abdul Ghaffar. The legal heirs of late Abdul Ghaffar Chandio viz; his widows appeared before Appellate Court and rendered no objection for grant of succession certificate, Appellate Court granted Succession Certificatevide order dated 29-11-2024, which is impugned through instant petition.Operative of order part beingPara No.9is reproduced herein below: "Keeping in view the above legal and factual position, I am of the considered view that appellant Mst. Shamul, respondent No.1 being her real son from her husband late Abdul Ghaffar, respondent No.4 and 5 also being wives of late Abdul Ghaffar are entitled to grant of succession certificate(s) as prayed. The share of Mst. Sharifan from the property under subject inherited from her son late Abdul Ghaffar had devolved upon her legal heirs. The succession certificate(s), therefore, be issued, the appellant shall be given her due share, share of respondent No.1 shall be deposited by the appellant in shape of saving certificate in favour of respondent No.1 with Accountant of District and Sessions Court, Kamber-Shahdadkot at Kamber, till he becomes adult. Shares of respondents No.4 & 5 shall be distributed in their favor by Accountant of District & Sessions Court, Kamber- Shahdadkot, and the share of Mst. Sharifan, the mother of late Abdul Ghaffar, shall be distributed in favour of her legal heirs in accordance with Muhammadan Law, by Accountant of District and Sessions Court, Kamber-Shahdadkot at Kamber. Learned counsel for appellant is directed to submit schedule of shares of appellant, respondent No.1, respondent No.4 & 5 and share of Mst. Sharifan (the mother of late Abdul Ghaffar), such share be highlighted in schedule, share of each legal heir of Mst. Sharifan Shall be outlined in the schedule to be submitted with a period of one month. With these directions this succession appeal is allowed. The succession certificate(s) will be issued after considering and going through the schedule of shares as directed. Each sharer in whose favor succession certificate shall be issued, shall furnish surety equivalent to share, determined after going through schedule to be submitted by counsel for appellant, to which the respondent's side shall have the right to point out if there is any illegality or error. Order accordingly." 4. Mr Safdar Ali Ghouri, Learned Counsel for the petitioners contended that Minor Shafiq ur Rehman is adopted child of Late Abdul Ghaffar, therefore he cannot succeed from the life Estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar. He contended that Mst Hanifan filed civil suit No 42/2019 Re Mst Hanifan Versus Mst
---
## Page 3
Shamul and others before the Court of Learned Senior Civil Judge Warah, seeking declaration that she was real mother of minor Shafiq Ur Rehman and he was adopted child of Late Abdul Ghaffar. Trial Court after full Trial by recording evidence of parties decreed the suit vide judgment and Decree dated 16.12.2022. He contended that MstShamul filed appeal No 22 of 2023 titled Mst Shamul and another Versus Mst Hanifan and others before the Court of Learned District Judge Kambar Shahdadkot, the Appeal filed by MstShamul was allowed by the Appellate Court vide judgment and decree dated 13.03.2024 as Mst Hanifan backed out from her earlier stance and recorded additional evidence adducing that Mst. Shamul was biological mother of minor Shafiq ur Rehman and he was real son of Late Abdul Gahffar. He contended that the Petitioners have assailed the judgment and decree of Appellate Court before this Court in Civil Revision Application No 55 of 2024 Re Aijaz Ali and others Versus Mst Shamul and others which is pending adjudication. He contended that parties are in dispute over heirship issue of Late Abdul Ghaffar, per his contention Late Abdul Ghaffar died issueless, though he solemnized marriage thrice, therefore he adopted Minor Shafiq ur Rehman who is son of Abdul Manan and such assertion finds support from litigations between the parties. He contended that per orders of Family Court, DNA test of Shafiq ur Rehman was conducted, his DNA matched with Mst Hanifan and he was declared his son by trial Court seized with Civil Suit No 42 of 2019. He contended that exclusion of Shafiq ur Rehman from linen descendance of Late Abdul Ghaffar will change entire scenario of Legal Heirs. He contended that Petitioners preferred an application under I Rule 10 CPC for impleading them as party in Succession Appeal which was declined and Respondents were declared as Legal Heirs of Late Abdul Ghaffar. He contended that the impugned order is illegal, null and void, thus not sustainable under the law. He prayed for allowing this petition. 5. Conversely, Mr. Zafar Ali Malghani Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents No.1 and 2 contended that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order as Late Abdul Ghaffar was survived by mother, one son and 3 widows. Under the law they were entitled to inherit the life estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar. He contended that in order to get share from property the Petitioners induced Mst Hanifan to claim herself to be the mother of Minor Shafiq ur Rehman and such claim has been rejected through adjudication by Civil Court. He contended that AppellateCourt granted the succession certificate to the extent of shares of each legal heirs and Petitioners have no right or interest in the life Estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar. He contended that Petitioner have got no rights or interest in the assets left by Late Abdul Ghaffar and Appellate Court rightly declined their claim. He supported the impugned order. 6. Learned Assistant Advocate General did not render any assistance and contended that government interest was not involved in the matter. 7. Heard arguments of the parties and examined the material available on record with the able assistance of Learned Counsel appearing for parties. 8. The bone of contention between the parties in the present petition is the entitlement of minor Shafiq-ur-Rehman from Life Estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar who was uncle of Petitioners.The Petitioners claim that Minor Shafiq ur Rehman is adopted child as such he will not get right of inheritance in Life Estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar and if he is allowed to inherit, it will deprive theirright toinheritance. Under Sharia, in fiqh e - Hanfi, if a person dies issueless his wife inherits 1/4th of his Life Estate and rest of the property goes to his brothers. The claim of the Petitioners is that Late Abdul Ghaffar died issueless leaving behind three widows and one mother as legal heirs, three widows shall inherit 1/4th share from life Estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar and remaining 3/4thshare will fall in the inheritance of his brothers (late father of the petitioners and Late Uncle Abdul Manan). Since Abdul Mannan and Abdul Ghaffar were real brothers therefore Shafiq ur Rehman at the time of birth was given in the lap of Mst Shamul and brought up by her. After the death of Abdul Ghaffar his brothers started a race to get declared Shafiq ur Rehman as son of Abdul Manan. To establish
---
## Page 4
such claim Mst. Hanifa wife of Late Abdul Manan filed Suit before Civil Court, wherein she claimed herself to be the mother of Shafiq-ur-Rehman. Initially the suit was decreed in favor of Mst Hanifan but it was reversed in appeal where she herself appeared and withdrew her claim of motherhood; her suit was dismissed. This dismissal provoked indignation in the family, petitioners in present petition have attacked the said decision of District Court before this Court through Civil Revision Application No 55 of 2024 which is yet to meet its fate.The much contested issue of succession has been resolved in favor of minor Shafiq ur Rehman, as the Appellate Court seized with succession appeal declined the application of Petitioners to examine their entitlement to receive share in the Life Estate of Late Abdul Ghaffar which includes a cash of Rs 6.2 Million and shares of Allied Bank and Habib Bank, besides Late Abdul Ghaffar has also left immoveable properties in his name and order passed by the Appellate Court is a first step towards determination of rights of the parties. 9. Matter in hand pertains to hotly debated issue of "Adoption" of children by issueless couples / parents. "Adoption" for the issueless couples has not been so easy in our country, for want of any law in field regulating this issue. There are a large number of children, deprived of parental care and leading orphanage life in Edhi Homes, Sweet Homes and other places and a similar number of couplesin search of "Adoption" to have a child in their lap. This is within the command and ordains of nature to bestow couples with offspring. Though the modern-day development in the field of biological sciences has eased this problem to a certain extent through different fertility concepts but cannot in any manner equate with the nature's blessings of being parent."Adoption" finds encouragement from both religion and society but yet to seek legislative shape in our country. "Adoption" in our Country is regulated through Guardian & Wards Act 1890 which does not in any manner protect the rights of child. The Guardian Court at the most can appoint a willing person as the Guardian of minor and cannot in any manner protect future rights of the minor. A child recognizes his parental relations through the care he gets. He identifies a person as his mother and father, in terms of love and affection he nurtures. Once he grows up, he finds that he was not under biological descendancy of the parents with whom he passed his life, he is ruined, society looks at him with a different eye, he becomes the talk of his friends, his social life comes to a standstill and he starts thinking in a different way. His attention diverts in the search of his real parents and when he looks at the love, care and affection of his adoptive parents, he treats the voices of missing parentage as joke. To curb all this to happen, the country needs to regulate "Adoption" by a law enacted through parliament, wherein a child if taken under "Adoption" should be mandatorily registrable. If a family is incapable of feeding a child due to poor economical conditions, it may leave the child at a registered "Adoption" center, wherefrom the issueless parents can take the custody of infant through registration, without changing his parentage as has been ordained by Holy Religion Islam. Though Religion Islam disentitles an "Adopted" child from right of inheritance but at the same time grants permission to bequeath 1/4th of the Life Estate in favor of "Adopted" Child, if legislation shapes this permission through a suitable lawmaking the problems being faced by adopted children in terms of rights to inheritance can be resolved with more ease and convenience. 10. The United Nations General Assembly in its 44/25 session held on 20th November 1989 adopted a resolution named "Universal Convention on Child Rights"to which Pakistan is also a signatory.The resolution recognized the rights including those of the adopted children. The convention contained in all 54 articles but preamble and relevant articles cognizant of the fundamental rights of children are reproduced below: Preamble The States Parties to the present Convention, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the
---
## Page 5
human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in the Charter, reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights and in the dignity and worth of the human person, and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Recognizing that the United Nations has, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenants on Human Rights, proclaimed and agreed that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, Recalling that, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations has proclaimed that childhood is entitled to special care and assistance, Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and particularly children, should be afforded the necessary protection and assistance so that it can fully assume its responsibilities within the community, Recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding, Considering that the child should be fully prepared to live an individual life in society, and brought up in the spirit of the ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular in the spirit of peace, dignity, tolerance, freedom, equality and solidarity, Bearing in mind that the need to extend particular care to the child has been stated in the Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child of 1924 and in the Declaration of the Rights of the Child adopted by the General Assembly on 20 November 1959 and recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (in particular in articles 23 and 24), in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (in particular in article 10) and in the statutes and relevant instruments of specialized agencies and international organizations concerned with the welfare of children, Bearing in mind that, as indicated in the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, "the child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth", Recalling the provisions of the Declaration on Social and Legal Principles relating to the Protection and Welfare of Children, with Special Reference to Foster Placement and Adoption Nationally and Internationally; the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules); and the Declaration on the Protection of Women and Children in Emergency and Armed Conflict, Recognizing that, in all countries in the world, there are children living in exceptionally difficult conditions, and that such children need special consideration, Taking due account of the importance of the traditions and cultural values of each people for the protection and harmonious development of the child, Recognizing the importance of international co-operation for improving the living conditions of children in every country, in particular in the developing countries, Have agreed as follows: PART I Article 1 For the purposes of the present Convention, a child means every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier. Article 2 1. States Parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child's or his or her
---
## Page 6
parent's or legal guardian's race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status. 2. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that the child is protected against all forms of discrimination or punishment on the basis of the status, activities, expressed opinions, or beliefs of the child's parents, legal guardians, or family members. Article 3 1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. 2. States Parties undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being, taking into account the rights and duties of his or her parents, legal guardians, or other individuals legally responsible for him or her, and, to this end, shall take all appropriate legislative and administrative measures. 3. States Parties shall ensure that the institutions, services and facilities responsible for the care or protection of children shall conform with the standards established by competent authorities, particularly in the areas of safety, health, in the number and suitability of their staff, as well as competent supervision. Article 4 States Parties shall undertake all appropriate legislative, administrative, and other measures for the implementation of the rights recognized in the present Convention. With regard to economic, social and cultural rights, States Parties shall undertake such measures to the maximum extent of their available resources and, where needed, within the framework of international co-operation. Article 5 States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents or, where applicable, the members of the extended family or community as provided for by local custom, legal guardians or other persons legally responsible for the child, to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance in the exercise by the child of the rights recognized in the present Convention. Article 6 1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life. 2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child. Article 7 1. The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and. as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents. 2. States Parties shall ensure the implementation of these rights in accordance with their national law and their obligations under the relevant international instruments in this field, in particular where the child would otherwise be stateless. Article 8 1. States Parties undertake to respect the right of the child to preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and family relations as recognized by law without unlawful interference. 2. Where a child is illegally deprived of some or all of the elements of his or her identity, States Parties shall provide appropriate assistance and protection, with a view to re-establishing speedily his or her identity. Article 9 1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with
---
## Page 7
applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. Such determination may be necessary in a particular case such as one involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents, or one where the parents are living separately and a decision must be made as to the child's place of residence. 2. In any proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1 of the present article, all interested parties shall be given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and make their views known. 3. States Parties shall respect the right of the child who is separated from one or both parents to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis, except if it is contrary to the child's best interests. 4. Where such separation results from any action initiated by a State Party, such as the detention, imprisonment, exile, deportation or death (including death arising from any cause while the person is in the custody of the State) of one or both parents or of the child, that State Party shall, upon request, provide the parents, the child or, if appropriate, another member of the family with the essential information concerning the whereabouts of the absent member(s) of the family unless the provision of the information would be detrimental to the well-being of the child. States Parties shall further ensure that the submission of such a request shall of itself entail no adverse consequences for the person(s) concerned. Article 11 1. States Parties shall take measures to combat the illicit transfer and non-return of children abroad. 2. To this end, States Parties shall promote the conclusion of bilateral or multilateral agreements or accession to existing agreements. Article 12 1. States Parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. 2. For this purpose, the child shall in particular be provided the opportunity to be heard in any judicial and administrative proceedings affecting the child, either directly, or through a…
Read the unabridged text and precedent citation network on Al Wakeelo Legal Research Platform.