Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 PLD 582
Court / Jurisdiction: SUPREME-COURT
Parties: ISHFAQ AHMED vs MUSHTAQ AHMEDHonorable Justice Syed Mansoor Ali ShahMoeen Ahmed,Khalid Jamil
This judicial decision was delivered by the SUPREME-COURT. The matter involves proceedings between ISHFAQ AHMED and MUSHTAQ AHMEDHonorable Justice Syed Mansoor Ali ShahMoeen Ahmed,Khalid Jamil, officially reported as 2025 PLD 582. The court reviewed applicable Pakistani statutes, procedural requirements, and governing case-law authorities. The full text below contains the complete facts, arguments, and legal reasoning rendered by the honorable bench.
P L D 2025 Supreme Court 582 Present: Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, JJ ISHFAQ AHMED ---Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMED and others---Respondents C.P.L.A. No. 1010-L of 2022, decided on 13th March, 2025. (Against the impugned judgment dated 24.03.2022 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in W.P. No. 75382 of 2021). (a) Punjab Rented Premises Act (VII of 2009)--- ----S. 19---Ejectment of tenant---Striking off defence---Petitioner/ landlord was aggrieved of judgment passed by High Court setting aside eviction order passed against respondent/tenant to vacate rented premises---Validity---Oral testimonies and documentary evidence produced by petitioner/landlord remained unchallenged, as right of respondent/tenant to cross-examine petitioner s/landlord s witnesses was struck off and that order attained finality, having remained unchallenged by respondent/tenant---In absence of any rebuttal or cross-examination, evidence led by petitioner/landlord stood uncontro-verted---Material on record conclusively established that petitioner/ landlord was lawful owner of the property---Rent proceedings, by their very nature, are summary in character and are intended to ensure swift and efficient resolution of landlord-tenant disputes, particularly in cases of default, so as to safeguard landlord s Constitutionally protected right to property---Petitioner/landlord remained embroiled in litigation for over seven years merely to recover possession of his property---Course of delay ran counter to the foundational objectives of rent legislation and summary adjudication---Such undue delays not only eroded Constitutional rights of property owners but had also given rise to broader economic and social justice concerns---For landlords, prolonged litigation entails financial strain, loss of rental income, and an inability to utilize their property for productive purposes, which can hinder economic growth---Conversely, tenants facing eviction proceedings often live in uncertainty, which can affect their social and economic stability---A just legal system must, therefore, ensure an equitable balance between rights of landlords and tenants, a balance that is fundamentally disrupted when cases are permitted to stagnate in judicial pipeline---Supreme Court set aside judgment passed by High Court and restored that of Lower Appellate Court, which had rightly upheld the claim of petitioner/landlord---Supreme Court directed respondent/tenant to vacate property in question within two months---Appeal was allowed. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 10A---Right to fair trial and due process of law---Artificial Intelligence (AI), use of---Principle---Right to a fair trial before a competent, independent, and impartial judge is a fundamental principle of due process---AI must not overshadow the core guarantee of judicial autonomy--- While AI has potential to improve consistency and efficiency in legal processes, it also carries risk of introducing biases and limiting judicial discretion---Fairness and transparency must apply equally to AI-assisted rulings---Though AI may enhance efficiency and consistency, it cannot replicate normative judgment, ethical reflection, or contextual sensitivity essential to the act of judging---Dignity of judicial role lies not in mechanical generation of outcomes but in deliberative process of reasoning, listening, and responding a task that remains inherently and irreducibly human---Judicial reasoning involves not only logic but also humanity and it requires attentiveness, moral courage, and the ability to question unjust laws or outdated precedents---By contrast, AI operates within the constraints of existing data and lacks creative imagination and jurisprudential foresight necessary to develop new legal doctrines or safeguard emergent rights---Comparative jurisdictions have cautiously explored AI-assisted adjudication. Article 10 provides: For the determination of his civil rights and obligations or in any criminal charge against him a person shall be entitled to a fair trial and due process. Article 37(d) provides: The State shall ensure inexpensive and expeditious justice. John Varghese, 'Artificial Intelligence Assisted Judicial Processes - A Primer' SSRN < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5056102 > accessed 8 April 2025; Adrian Zuckerman, 'Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice' in The Civil Procedure Rules at 20 (Oxford University Press, 2020) and Yadong Cui, Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization (Springer, 2020). J Juan David Guti rrez, 'ChatGPT in Colombian Courts: Why We Need to Have a Conversation About the Digital Literacy of the Judiciary' (23 February 2023) Verfassungsblog https://verfassungsblog.de/colombian-chatgpt/ accessed 6 April 2025. Janus Rose, 'A Judge Just Used ChatGPT to Make a Court Decision' (3 February 2023) VICE https://www.vice.com/en/article/ judge-used-chatgpt-to-make-court-decision/ accessed 6 April 2025; 6 Bob Ambrogi, 'Should Courts Use ChatGPT? In This Appellate Opinion, Both the Majority and Dissenting Opinions Did' (10 March 2025) LawNext https://www.lawnext.com/2025/03/should-courts-use-chatgpt-in-this-appellate-opinion-both-the-majority-and-dissenting-opinions-did.html accessed 6 April 2025; District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 'Ross v. United States' (2025) Justia https://law.justia.com/cases/ district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/2025/23-cm-1067.html accessed 6 April 2025; Judge Amir Munir, Additional District and Sessions Judge (Punjab) in a civil appeal (Muhammad Iqbal v. Zayad) judgment dated 28.03.2023 < https://courtingthelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/DOC-20230413-WA0052..pdf> and a pre-arrest bail (The State v. AM (a juvenile) judgment dated 29.03.2023 <https://courtingthelaw.com/wp-content/ uploads/ChatGPT-4-Abdul-Moaiz-v-State.-FIR-No. - 15-2023.-Offence-376iii-51 1-P.S-Bhagat..-allowed.-29.03.2023.pdf> accessed 28 March 2025; AI-driven methodologies, including machine learning ("ML") algorithms, generative AI ("GenAI"), predictive modelling and advanced text analytics, e.g., natural language processing ("NLP"); Joely Williamson, 'The Rise of AI in Legal Practice: Opportunities, Challenges, & Ethical Considerations' (21 March 2025) Colo Tech LJ https://ctlj.colorado.edu/?p=1297 accessed 6 April 2025; LexisNexis, 'The Power of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Research' (6 November 2023) https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/b/thought-leadership/posts/the-power-of-artificialintelligence-in-legal - research accessed 6 April 2025; This includes the NLP, ML, and Large-Scale Data Analytics; Thomson Reuters, 'Westlaw: Legal Research Platforms' https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/westlaw accessed 29 March 2025; Thomson Reuters, 'Westlaw Expert Materials' https://legal. thomsonreuters.com/en/products/westlaw/expert-materials accessed 29 March 2025; Thomson Reuters, 'Compare Westlaw Plans' https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/westlaw/plans-andpricing accessed 29 March 2025; Thomson Reuters, 'Westlaw Editorial Enhancements' https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/westlaw/expert - materials accessed 29 March 2025. Casetext, 'CARA A.I.: Case Analysis Research Assistant for Legal Professionals' https://www.casetext. com/cara-ai accessed 29 March 2025; Valerie McConnell, 'What Is CARA A.I. and How Do I Use It?' Casetext Help Center https://help.casetext.com/en/articles/1971642-what-is-cara-a-i-and-how-do-i-use-it accessed 29 March 2025. Stanford Law School, 'Putting Casetext's CARA to the Test' https://law.stanford.edu/2016/12/09/ putting-casetextscara-to-the-test/ accessed 29 March 2025; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, The Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) - Companion Document, Government of Canada https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/ artificial-intelligence-and-data-act-aida-companion-document accessed 29 March 2025; Casetext, 'What Is CoCounsel?' Casetext Help Center https://help.casetext.com/en/articles/7040012-what-is-cocounsel accessed 29 March 2025; vLex, 'Legal Research Platform Overview' https://vlex.com/legal-research accessed 29 March 2025; vLex, 'International Research Tools and Jurisdictions' https://vlex.com/inter-national-research accessed 29 March 2025; vLex Networks Ltd, 'vLex: International Legal Research Platform' https://vlex.com accessed 1 April 2025; Sandeep Singh Sengar and others, 'Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications' (2025) 34 Multimed Tools Appl 913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20016-1 accessed 29 March 2025; Zarif Bin Akhtar, 'Unveiling the Evolution of Generative AI (GAI): A Comprehensive and Investigative Analysis Toward LLM Models (2021-2024) and Beyond' (2024) 11 J Elec Sys & Info Tech 22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-024-00145-1 accessed 29 March 2025; Leonardo Banh and Gero Strobel, 'Generative Artificial Intelligence' (2023) 33 Electron Mkts 63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1 accessed 29 March 2025; Qihao Zhu and Jianxi Luo, 'Generative Pre-Trained Transformer for Design Concept Generation' (2022) Proceedings of the Design Society https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.185 accessed 2 April, 2025, and Deepti Raj and others, 'Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) in Research: A Systematic Review' (2023) 15(2) Information 99 https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/15/2/99 accessed 2 April 2025; Judge GPT has been conceptualized and extended to the FJA by Professor Elliott Ash and Professor Christoph Goessmann of ETH Zurich, and Dr. Sultan Mehmood of the New Economic School, Russia. The successful implementation of this AI initiative has been overseen by the Director General of the FJA, Mr. Hayat Ali Shah, along with Judge Shazia Munawar Makhdoom, former Additional Director (Programs and ICT), FJA; Judges using AI must ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability by disclosing AI assistance, avoiding overreliance on automated decisions, and maintaining human oversight. They should audit AI for bias, protect data privacy, and allow parties to challenge AI-generated inputs. Judicial training on AI's risks and limitations is essential, and decisions must remain explainable and contestable to uphold due process. AI should aid, not replace judicial discretion, with continuous monitoring to align with legal and ethical standards, preserving public trust in the justice system; Marcel Kahan and Troy A. McKenzie, 'Judge Shopping' (2021) 13 Journal of Legal Analysis 341 https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laab007 accessed 6 April 2025; Shloke Singh Nair, 'Get in, Litigants: We're Going Judge Shopping!' (2025) 93 George Washington Law Review 159; Alexander Gouzoules, 'Choosing Your Judge' (2024) 77 SMU Law Review 699 (Fall); Paul R. Gugliuzza and J. Jonas Anderson, 'Why Do Judges Compete for Cases?' (2024) 104 Boston University Law Review 1963; Ahmed E. Taha, 'Judge Shopping: Testing Whether Judges' Political Orientations Affect Case Filings' (2010) 78 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1007 (Spring); Theresa Rusnak, 'Related Case Rules and Judge Shopping: A Resolvable Problem' (2015); 28 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 913 (Summer); Tamar Kricheli-Katz and Keren Weinshall, 'Judging Fast or Slow: The Effects of Reduced Caseloads on Gender- and Ethnic-Based Disparities in Case Outcomes' (2023); 20 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 961 https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12363 accessed 6 April 2025; David N. Figinski and David Neumark, 'Workplace Disruptions, Judge Caseloads, and Judge Decisions' (2022) 205 Journal of Public Economics 104554 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104554 accessed 6 April 2025; Dragutin S. Avramovic and Ilija D. Jovanov, '(Im)Partiality of a Judge and Artificial Intelligence' (2023) Strani Pravni Zivot 161 (Apr -June); Guodong Du and Meng Yu, 'How Does the Chinese Court Decide Which Judge Will Hear Your Case?' China Justice Observer (16 June 2019) https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/how-does-the-chinese-court-decide-which-judge-will-hear-your-case accessed 3 April 2025; Shucheng Wang, 'Guiding Cases and Bureaucratization of Judicial Precedents in China' (2019) 14 U. Pa. Asian L. Rev.96, 135 https://ssrn.com/ abstract=3267339 accessed 3 April 2025; Susan Finder and Straton Papagianneas, 'Guidance on the Special Handling of Four Types of Cases & Its Implications' Supreme People's Court Monitor (21 February 2022) https://supremepeoplescourtmonitor.com/tag/judicial-esponsibility/ #:~:text=responsibility%20system,levels%20designated%20judges%20hearing%20cases accessed 3 April 2025; Changming Hu, 'Judicial Reform: Safeguarding Fairness and Justice', in Tian He and Yanbin Lv (eds), The Chinese Path of Rule of Law Construction (Springer 2021) 47-89; Information Office of the State Council, The People's Republic of China, Judicial Reform in China (October 2012) https://english. www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2014/08/23/content_281474983043170.htm accessed 3 April 2025; Supreme People's Court of China, 'An Overview of the 6th Five-Year Reform Outline of the People's Courts' (3 January 2025) https://english.court.gov.cn/2025-01/03/c_1078244. htm accessed 3 April 2025; Luis Mar a Palma, 'Judicial Administration in Kazakhstan: Achievements and Perspectives' (2023) 15 Court Administrator Fall 35, 37; Katar na Staronov & Em lia Sic kov -Beblav , Corruption and Anti-Corruption Measures in Central and Eastern Europe (NISPAcee Press 2009) https://www.nispa.org/files/ publications/ebooks/nispacee-corruption2009.pdf accessed 3 April 2025; Ivan Remia , 'Judges Fired for Mismanagement' The Slovak Spectator' (23 August 1999) https://spectator.sme.sk/politics-and-society/c/judges-fired-for-mismanagement accessed 3 April 2025; European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ), Minimum Judicial Standards IV: Allocation of Cases (ENCJ Report 2013 2014) https://www.encj.eu/ images/stories/pdf/workinggroups/encj_report_standards_iv_allocation_of_cases_2014.pdf ac cessed 3 April 2025; OECD, Anti-Corruption Reforms in Georgia: Pilot 5th Round of Monitoring Under the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan (OECD Publishing 2022) https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/anti-corruption-reforms-ingeorgia_ d709c349-en.html accessed 3 April 2025; AI4SDGs ThinkTank Observatory, Prometea: Transforming the Administration of Justice with Artificial Intelligence Tools (AI4SDGs Website, 2020) https://www.ai-for-sdgs.academy/case/245 accessed 6 April 2025; Juan Gustavo Corval n, Prometea: Artificial Intelligence to Transform Justice and Public Organizations (2020) 6 Int'l J. Digital & Data L.https:// core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322501055.pdf accessed 6 April 2025; Victor Saavedra & Juan Carlos Upegui, PretorIA and Automating the Processing of Human Rights Cases (Derechos Digitales Report, 2021) https://www.derechosdigitales.org/wp-content/uploads/05_ Informe Colombia-EN_180222.pdf accessed 6 April 2025; Lorenzo Villegas-Carrasquilla & Mariana Jaramillo, The Constitutional Court of Colombia Pronounces on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Judicial Tutela Proceedings (CMS Colombia, 14 August 2024) https://cms.law/en/col/publication/the-constitutional-courtof- colombia-pronounces-on-the-use-of-generative-artificial - intelligence - tools - in-judicial-tutela-proceedings accessed 6 April 2025; Victor Saavedra & Juan Carlos Upegui, PretorIA and Automating the Processing of Human Rights Cases (Derechos Digitales Report, March 2021) https:// www.derechosdigitales.org/wp- content/uploads/05_Informe-Colombia-EN_180222.pdf accessed 6 April 2025; Andr Corr a d'Almeida, 'AI-Driven Innovations at the Brazilian Judiciary' (Columbia SIPA, Spring 2020) https://www.sipa.columbia.edu/aidriven-innovations-brazilian-judiciary accessed 6 April 2025; Funda o Getulio Vargas (FGV), 'Project Maps Artificial Intelligence Systems Used by Brazilian Judiciary' (FGV News, 10 October 2023) https://portal.fgv.br/ en/ news/project-maps-artificial-intelligence-systems-used-brazilian-judiciary accessed 6 April 2025; David Uriel Socol de la Osa and Nydia Remolina, 'Artificial Intelligence at the Bench: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Informing-or Misinforming -Judicial Decision-Making Through Generative AI' (2024) Data & Policy, Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/data-and-policy/article/ artificial-intelligence-at-the-bench-legal-and-ethical - challenges - of-informingor-misinformingjudicial-decisionmaking-through- generative-ai/D1989AC5C81FB67A5FABB552D3831E46 accessed 6 April 2025; Artificial Intelligence (AI): Guidance for Judicial Office Holders, Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (2023) < https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AI-Judicial-Guidance.pdf>; Guidelines for Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Courts and Tribunals: Judges, Judicial Officers, Tribunal Members and Judicial Support Staff, Courts of New Zealand (2023) < https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/6-Going-to-Court/practice-directions/practice-guidelines/ all - benches/ 20231207-GenAI-Guidelines-Judicial.pdf> Martin Felsky and Professor Karen Eltis, Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Canadian Courts (2024) < https://cjc-ccm.ca/sites/default/files/documents/2024/ AI%20Guidelines%20-%20FINAL%20-%202024-09%20-%20EN. pdf> Felicity Bell, Lyria Bennett Moses, Michael Legg, Jake Silove and Monika Zalnieriute, AI Decision-Making and the Courts: A guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators, The Australian Institute of Judicial Administration (2022) < https://aija.org.au/wp-content/ uploads/woocommerce_uploads/2022/06/AI-DECISION-MAKING- AND-THE-COURTS_Report_V5-2022-06-20-1lzkls.pdf> accessed 27 March 2025; Carlos Zednik and Hannes Boelsen, 'AISB 2021 Symposium Proceedings: Overcoming Opacity in Machine Learning' (2021) Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour https://aisb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/AISB21_Opacity_ Pro-ceedings accessed 6 April 2025; Rt Hon Sir Robert Buckland KBE KC MP, 'AI, Judges and Judgment: Setting the Scene' (2023) M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series, No. 220 https://www.hks.harvard. edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/working.papers/Final_AWP_220.pdf accessed 6 April 2025; Jocelyn Maclure, 'AI, Explainability and Public Reason: The Argument from the Limitations of the Human Mind' (2021) 31 Minds and Machines 421 https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007/s11023-021-09570-x accessed 6 April 2025; David Uriel Socol de la Osa and Nydia Remolina, 'Artificial Intelligence at the Bench: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Informing-or Misinforming-Judicial Decision-Making Through Generative AI' (2024) 6 Data & Policy e59 https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.53 accessed 6 April 2025; Michele Salvagno, Fabio Silvio Taccone and Alberto Giovanni Gerli, 'Artificial Intelligence Hallucinations' (2023) 27 Critical Care, Art. 180 https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-023-04473-y accessed 6 April 2025; Negar Maleki, Balaji Padmanabhan and Kaushik Dutta, 'AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying' (2024) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06796 accessed 6 April 2025; Andres Algaba, Carmen Mazijn, Vincent Holst, Floriano Tori, Sylvia Wenmackers and Vincent Ginis, 'Large Language Models Reflect Human Citation Patterns with a Heightened Citation Bias' (2024) arXiv https://arxiv.org/html/2405.15739v3 accessed 6 April 2025; Sam Skolnik, 'Lawyer Sanctioned Over AI-Hallucinated Case Cites, Quotations' Bloomberg Law (26 November 2024) https://news. bloomberglaw.com/litigation/lawyer-sanctioned- over- ai - hallucinated-case-cites-quotations; Dan Milmo and Agency, 'Two US Lawyers Fined for Submitting Fake Court Citations from ChatGPT' The Guardian (23 June 2023) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jun/23/two-us-lawyers-fined-submitting-fake-court-citations-chatgpt accessed 6 April 2025; Sara Merken, 'Judge Fines Lawyers in Walmart Lawsuit Over Fake, AI-Generated Cases' Reuters (25 February 2025) https://www. reuters.com/legal/government/judge-fines-lawyers-walmart-lawsuit-over-fake-ai-generated-cases-2025-02-25/ accessed 6 April 2025; Sascha Schweitzer and Markus Conrads, 'The Digital Transformation of Jurisprudence: An Evaluation of ChatGPT-4's Applicability to Solve Cases in Business Law' (2024) 33 Artificial Intelligence and Law https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-024-09406-w accessed 6 April 2025; Lexi Aida, 'Evaluating GPT-4's Impact on Legal Document Review' The Legal Wire (15 December 2023) https:// thelegalwire.ai/evaluating-gpt-4s-impact-on-legal - document - review/ accessed 6 April 2025; Jamie Eggertsen, 'What You Need to Know: AI Disclosure Rules in Legal Filings' Eve Legal Blog (19 March 2025) https://www.eve.legal/blogs/what-you-need-to-know-ai-disclosure-rules-in-legal-filings accessed 6 April 2025; Hon. Ralph Artigliere (Ret.), 'AI Hallucinations in Court: A Wake-Up Call for the Legal Profession' EDRM (21 January 2025) https://edrm.net/2025/01/ai-hallucinations-in-court-a-wake-up-call-for-the-legal-profession/ accessed 6 April 2025; Francesco Contini, Elena Alina Ontanu and Marco Velicogna, 'AI Accountability in Judicial Proceedings: An Actor-Network Approach' (2024) 13 Laws 71 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/6/71 accessed 6 April 2025; Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Sir Geoffrey Vos and Sir Keith Lindblom, 'Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Judicial Guidance' (12 December 2023) Courts and Tribunals Judiciary htt~s://www.judiciary. uk/guidance-andresources/artificial-intelligence - aijudicial - guidance/ accessed 6 April 2025; Changqing Shi, Tania Sourdin and Bin Li, 'The Smart Court - A New Pathway to Justice in China' International Journal for Court Administration (Volume 12, Issue 1, 2021); Marco Fabri, 'From Court Automation to e-Justice and Beyond in Europe' International Journal for Court Administration (Volume 15, Issue 3, 2024) and Tania Sourdin and Archie Zariski (eds.), The Responsive Judge: International Perspectives (Springer 2018); Orrie Dinstein and Jaymin Kim, 'Human in the Loop in AI Risk Management - Not a Cure-All Approach' (21 August 2024) IAPP https://iapp.org/news/a/-human-in-the-loop-in-ai-risk-management-not-a-cure-all-approach accessed 6 April 2025; Catelijne Muller, 'Artificial Intelligence: Europe Needs to Take a Human-inCommand Approach' (31 May 2017) EESC Press Release, Ref. No. 27/2017 https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/newsmedia/ press-releases/artificial-intelligence-europe-needs-take-human-command-approach-says-eesc accessed 6 April 2025; Rub n Gonz lez-Sendino, Emilio Serrano, Javier Bajo and Paulo Novais, 'A Review of Bias and Fairness in Artificial Intelligence' (2023) International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, University of Minho, Portugal https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1741613/ FULLTEXT01.pdf accessed 6 April 2025; 'Quantifying Health, Proxy Bias: Simple Explanation + Example' (2023) Quantifying Health https://quantifyinghealth.com/proxy-bias/ accessed 6 April 2025; United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (16 December 1966) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments / inter-national-covenant-civil-and-political-rights; United Nations Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 32, Article 14: Right to Equality Before Courts and Tribunals and to Fair Trial (23 August 2007) https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/606075?v=pdf accessed 6 April 2025; UNESCO, Global Toolkit on AI and the Rule of Law for the Judiciary (2023) https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/documentViewer. xhtml?v=2.1.196&id=p::usmarcdef_0000387331 &file=/in/rest/ annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_166bac11-442c-4e26-9091- 33532c191d84%3F_%3D387331eng.pdf&locale= en&multi=true&ark=/ark:/48223/pf0000387331/PDF/387331eng .pdf accessed 27 March 2025; UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021) https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000381137 accessed 6 April 2025; Council of Europe, CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment (4 December 2018) https://www.coe. int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of- artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment accessed 6 April, 2025; Council of Europe, The Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence (5 September 2024) https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence accessed 6 April 2025; European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Art. 22: Automated Individual Decision-Making, Legislation. gov.uk (Apr. 27, 2016) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2016/679/ article/22 accessed 6 April 2025; OECD, OECD Framework and Good Practice Principles for People-Centred Justice, OECD Digital Library (2021),…
Read the unabridged text and precedent citation network on Al Wakeelo Legal Research Platform.