HYDERABAD vs ZARIN KHAN AND ANOTHER Case No — 1970 PLC 347

Citation: 1970 PLC 347

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-03-26

Parties: DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD vs ZARIN KHAN AND ANOTHER

Headnotes

Result: appeal is dismissed Judgment ORDER This is an appeal against an order of the learned Chairman of the Second West Pakistan Industrial Court, Karachi, dated December 4, 1969. The impugned Order was passed on an application under section 38 of the West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance, 1968 (hereinafter called the repealed Ordi--nance), whereby, the learned Chairman ordered the respondent, Zarin Khan to be re- instated as driver with full back benefits.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Industrial Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Inamullah Khan Title:DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD vs ZARIN KHAN AND ANOTHER Case No.: Appeal No. HYD-1 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-03-26 Reported As: 1970 PLC 347 Result: appeal is dismissed Judgment ORDER This is an appeal against an order of the learned Chairman of the Second West Pakistan Industrial Court, Karachi, dated December 4, 1969. The impugned Order was passed on an application under section 38 of the West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance, 1968 (hereinafter called the repealed Ordi--nance), whereby, the learned Chairman ordered the respondent, Zarin Khan to be re- instated as driver with full back benefits. Zarin Khan was charge-sheeted for disobeying the order of his superior. The misconduct, if proved, would be covered by the section 7(2)(a) of the Road Transport Workers Ordinance, 1961. Zarin Khan was charge-sheeted for the alleged misconduct. The Enquiry was conducted by Urz Mohammad Abro who found the driver guilty of the alleged misconduct. The District Manager accepted the report of the Enquiry Officer and terminated the services of the respondent w.e.f. 18th September 1968. 2. The case against the driver, Zarin Khan, was, that on 1 June 1968, the Despatcher, Mushtaq Hussain, asked him to go on line but he refused on the ground that his duty was over. He was asked to go Khaddun-III, service, but he stated that he would either go to Qazi Ahmad or no where 3. The learned…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.