ALI NABI KHAN vs M. A. BARI, DXVISIONAL ENGINEER III, GAMMON (EAST — 1971 PLC 529

Citation: 1971 PLC 529

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-08-17

Parties: ALI NABI KHAN vs M. A. BARI, DXVISIONAL ENGINEER III, GAMMON (EAST PAKISTAN) LTD., CHITTAGONG

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 529

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Juned Ahmed Chaudhry, M. A. Subur, Ms. Nurul Huda Title:ALI NABI KHAN vs M. A. BARI, DXVISIONAL ENGINEER III, GAMMON (EAST PAKISTAN) LTD., CHITTAGONG Case No.: Complaint Case No. 92 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-08-17 Reported As: 1971 PLC 529 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN).-16-8-70 being Sunday, the record is put up today. Tae petitioner in this case, Ali Nabi Khan, has filed this case under section 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, for benefits available to him under section 19 of the Act for termination of his service under the 2wrd party Gammon Ltd. The petitioner alleges that he was a Peon of the 2nd party at a monthly salary of Rs. 90 and his service was terminated on 24-12-69. The petitioner then submitted a grievance petition on 7-1-70 to which the 2nd party replied stating that the petitioner is entitled to no benefits. 2nd party in spite of notice has not appeared to contest the case. So it has been heard ex parte. We are to consider what benefits the petitioner is entitled to in this case. The petitioner is alleging that he was appointed in service in February 1968 and that he is a permanent employee. He has referred to his appointment letter in his application which is dated 13-3-69. In his grievance petition also he referred to his appointment by this matter. So the story that the petitioner was appointed in service in February 1968 cannot be accepted. A copy of the…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.