AMJAD MIAH vs A, K. M. YUNUS — 1970 PLC 843

Citation: 1970 PLC 843

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-06-04

Parties: AMJAD MIAH vs A, K. M. YUNUS

Headnotes

Result: Appeal Dismissed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is all applica--tion -under section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: AMJAD MIAH vs A, K. M. YUNUS Case No.: Complaint Case No. 28 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1970-06-04 Reported As: 1970 PLC 843 Result: Appeal Dismissed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is all applica--tion -under section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The case of the first party is that he was employed as a motor driver under the second party on 20- 1-67 at a monthly salary of Rs. 300'00. The second party was not regular towards payment of his salary and there were part payments as a result of which an amount of Rs. 3,427 fell in arrear by the end of 1968. The second party decided to close truck business for a period of 3 months in the middle of 1968 and told the first party to come after 3 months to resume his duties as well as for arrear payment. On 10-11-68 the first party went to resume his duties, but he was told to come on another date as the truck was not fit and finally he was told to come on 5-12-68. But he was not allowed to resume his duties on 5-12-68. He was told to come after a week. So the first, party became suspicious of the motive of the second party. He then pressed for resuming his duties but he was then informed that his services were no longer required. During his service period he was not allowed any kind of leave. The first party sent a grievance petition on…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.