BADIUR RAHMAN vs THE DISTRICT MANAGER — 1970 PLC 847

Citation: 1970 PLC 847

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-06-27

Parties: BADIUR RAHMAN vs THE DISTRICT MANAGER, E. P. R. T. C., DACCA

Headnotes

Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN): This is an application under section 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: BADIUR RAHMAN vs THE DISTRICT MANAGER, E. P. R. T. C., DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 371 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1970-06-27 Reported As: 1970 PLC 847 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN): This is an application under section 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act. The case of the first party is that he was a security guard since 24-9-68 under the second party. The petitioner was dismissed from service on 20-11-69 for alleged misconduct of theft and bribery. F. I. R. was lodged with the Police, but the Police did not submit charge-sheet against the first party. But to the departmental enquiry he was held guilty in an unfair him where he was not given proper opportunities to defend Hence he was highly aggrieved by the order of dismissal and he preferred a grievance petition which was not replied to by the second party. Hence this application with a prayer for re-instatement to his former post with arrear back-wages. The second party entered into appearance by filing written objection. It was stated by the second party that the first party was not a worker and that there was a full-fledged enquiry against the first party on charges of misconduct such as; abetment of theft and bribery, that he was given proper opportunities to defend himself during the enquiry and that lie was…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.