Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2005 YLR 3215

MIR MUHAMMAD and 4 others vs THE STATE

Petitioner: MIR MUHAMMAD and 4 others VS Respondent: THE STATE

Court: Sindh High Court Decision Date: 2005-07-06

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Rehmat Hussain Jaffery Title: MIR MUHAMMAD and 4 others vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No.218 of 2005 Date of Judgment:2005-07-06 Reported As: 2005 YLR 3215 Result: Order accordingly

Judgment ORDER ' RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.--- The learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that if the trial Court records the evidence of main witnesses within a period of two months then he would not press the bail application at this stage.. ' From the record it appears that some of the accused are still absconders. The trial Court is directed to separate the case of accused who are absconders and then proceed with the case against the remaining accused by framing the charge after compliance of section 265-C, Cr.P.C. And then record the evidence of material witnesses within the above mentioned period. After recording the evidence of some of the witnesses the applicants are at liberty to move fresh bail application before the trial Court which shall be decided on merits. The application is disposed of.

Related Legal Research & Directories