Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1993 CLC 1911

SARTAJ RESTAURANT vs ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN and others

Petitioner: SARTAJ RESTAURANT VS Respondent: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Sindh High Court Decision Date: 1991-10-30

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Mamoon Kazi, Abdul Rahim Kazi Title: SARTAJ RESTAURANT vs ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN and others Case No.: Constitutional Petition No, 470 of 1986 Date of Judgment:1991-10-30 Reported As: 1993 CLC 1911 Result: Order accordingly

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT ' MAMOON KAZI, J.---Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that a similar question of law is involved in the present petition as was involved in C.Ps. Nos, D-489/86, D-490/86 and D-506/86 earlier decided by a Division Bench of this Court. It may be pointed out that in the said petitions, the excise duty had been determined by the respondents against the petitioners in absence of the petitioners without giving them an opportunity of hearing, therefore, the case was remanded for a fresh disposal. Mr. Abdul Sattar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not dispute the factual position in the present case. Under the circumstances, this petition is also remanded to respondent No,3 for fresh disposal in accordance with the law.

Related Legal Research & Directories