Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MULLAH AHMED VS Respondent: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, Sibi And 7 Other
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Mian Burhanuddin Khan, Abdul Qadir Sheikh, S. A. Nusrat Title: MULLAH AHMED vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, Sibi And 7 Other Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 3-Q of 1983 Appeal No. 5 of 1981 Date of Judgment:1986-05-05 Reported As: 1986 SCMR 1624 Result: Appeal dismissed
Judgment ORDER ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.--This appeal by leave is directed against the two judgments of the Baluchistan High Court, dated ltt-6-1981 and 2-11-1981, by the former judgment, a constitution petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed, and by the latter, review petition filed by him also met with the same fate. Learned counsel for the respondents raised the preliminary objection that although the appeal is within time so as the judgment, dated 2-11-1981 is concerned, it is totally time-barred against the judgment, dated 10-6-1981. This position is conceded by the learned counsel for the appellant who, however, prays that the delay may be condoned. The oral submissions made by him for the condonation of the delay do not make out valid justification for the condonation, we therefore, treat this appeal as time-barred against the impugned order of the High Court, dated 10-6-1981 by which constitution petition was dismissed. So far as impugned order of the High Court, dated 2-11-1981 is concerned, we find that the High Court has dismissed the review application filed by the petitioner for the reasons with which no exception in law can be taken. The appeal, therefore, has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. The parties are left to bear their own costs.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.