Mian ABDUL GHAFOOR vs SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT — 1971 PLC 120

Citation: 1971 PLC 120

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-07-02

Parties: MANICK CHANDRA SEAL vs THE MANAGING PARTNER, FAZLI BROTHERS, CHITTAGONG

Headnotes

[C.S.T.] Result: N/A Judgment ORDER S. MAHMOOD (CHAIRMAN).-The appellant was show senior to respondent No.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title:MANICK CHANDRA SEAL vs THE MANAGING PARTNER, FAZLI BROTHERS, CHITTAGONG Case No.: Date of Judgment:1970-07-02 Reported As: 1971 PLC 120 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN). The petitioner Manik Chandra Seal alleges that he was serving under the 2nd party as an Accountant on a monthly salary of Rs. 250. He served for more than 3 months when on 1-7-1969 his service was terminated without any notice. During the period of service lye did not also get. his full, wages. So he has filed the present case under, section 25 of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act. .2nd party entered appearance, filed petitions for times and filed W. S., but did not ultimately contest the case. According to the statement of the petitioner he was appointed on 26-3-1969 and he was discharged on 1-7-1969. He did not complete his probationary period. He was, therefore, a temporary hand. Grievance petition was submitted but to no effect. In this case the petitioner is entitled to one month's notice pay. Over and above that he will get leis arrear pays due. No clear case of house- rent support is made out. So we refuse to include house-rent in the pay. Members also advise accordingly. The -petitioner will thus get as follows from the second party: (a) Notice payRs. 250 (b) Arrear, pay... Rs. 556 Total Amount ...Rs. 806 Second party do pay up the about amount of Rs. 806 to the…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.