Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD SALMAN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Sarmad Jalal Osmany Title: MUHAMMAD SALMAN vs THE STATE Case No.: Crl. Bail Application No,555 of 2006 Date of Judgment:2006-06-16 Reported As: 2009 YLR 1269 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER SARMAD JALAL OSMANY, J.---Granted. 2. Per learned Counsel, he had approached for bail before arrest, before learned Trial Court which has, per impugned order, issued notice and hence the applicant has no option but to apply before this Court for the same relief. In these circumstances, office, objection is overruled. 3. Granted subject to all just exception. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant says that the only piece of evidence available against the applicant/accused is the police statement of co-accused which cannot be relied upon by the Prosecution for convicting the applicant/accused. Secondly per learned counsel, co-Accused have nominated the applicant/accused due to enmity etc. He, therefore, prays that interim bail before arrest may be accorded to the applicant/accused particularly since when he approached the learned Trial Court, notice was issued on his bail application only. ' I have heard learned counsel and gone through the impugned order. In the facts and circumstances, interim bail before arrest is granted to the applicant/accused subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 (Rupees One Lac only) and PR Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this court. Issue notice to the DAG. ' To come up for confirmation or otherwise on 20-6-2006.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.