Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: A.R. SMITH & CO. Through Zafar Lqbal And Another VS Respondent: GRINDLAYS BANK LTD And Another
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Aslam Riaz Hussain Title:A.R. SMITH & CO. Through Zafar Lqbal And Another vs GRINDLAYS BANK LTD
And Another Case No.: Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 400 of 1984 Appeal No. 544 of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-05-16 Reported As: 1987 SCMR 392(1) Result: Interim stay Judgment ORDER Petitioner's Counsel submits that the question which he wishes to raise in the case is as to whether security can be demanded by the Court from the petitioner twice. This contention arises from the fact that the High Court first asked him to furnish a security-bond at the time of entertainment of the appeal, but subsequently, when he prayed for a stay order, the High Court required him to deposit decretal amount in cash. Notice to the respondents for a very early date. Status quo in the mean while.