Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Miss SUMATRA NOSHEEN VS Respondent: PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF COMMERCE, VEHARI and 3 others
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Maulvi Anwar-ul-Haq Title:Miss SUMATRA NOSHEEN vs PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF
COMMERCE, VEHARI and 3 others Case No.: Writ Petition No.4113 of 2005 Date of Judgment:2005-07-12 Reported As: 2005 MLD 1759 Result: Order accepted Judgment ORDER The petitioner, a student of B.Com. Part-I, feels aggrieved of the report and the Notification dated 22-6-2005 whereby she has been expelled from the College for one year and her admission of B.Com. Part-I Examination for Baha-ud-Din Zakaria University, Multan, has also been withdrawn. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that notwithstanding the contents of the writ petition, his client should have been given a chance to re-consider and to tender due anolopy as was done by her similarly charged co-students who has been only issued a warning. 3. I have examined the report and the said notification. Without making any further comments, I find that the Notification dated 22-6-2005 is subject to a review/appeal which is stated to have been filed. If this is so, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the said review/appeal be taken up without any further loss of time as the examinations are. About to begin. It is further directed that in case the petitioner duly tenders apology, she will be treated like her co-student in the matter and would be allowed to take part in the examination as a regular student. A copy of this order be immediately remitted to the respondents.