Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 526. In this matter between Criminal Miscelleneous 88/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur - Mst. Mai Pathani (Appellant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Criminal Miscelleneous 88/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur CITATION: 2025 SHC SUK 517 PARTIES: Mst. Mai Pathani (Appellant) ORDER DATE: 21-FEB-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ Order Sheet IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR

Crl. Misc. Application No.S-88 of 2025

Date of hearing Order with signature of Judge.

Hearing of Case 1.For orders on office objections 2.For hearing of main case 21-02-2025

Mr. Saifullah Soomro, Advocate for applicant. Syed Sardar Ali Shah, APG P.G for the State a/w Inspector Shafi Muhammad, SHO, P.S, Patni, SIP Nazeer Ahmed, I.O and ASI Ghulam Ali, complainant. ***** Statements filed by respondents No.1 to 3 a re taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. On perusal of impugned order dated 30.01.2025, it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge -II, Sukkur has dismissed the application filed by applicant seeking permission to record her second statement under section 164 CrPC for the reasons that there is no exceptional circumstance to justify for doing so. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge has assigned valid and cogent reasons while passing the impugned order and no illegality or infirmity is found in the impugned order requiring interference of this Court. Accordingly, instant Crl. Misc. Application is dismissed. JUDGE

Ahmad

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant