Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 625/2026 (S.B.) Akhgar Anwar Awan V/S Abdul Samad Soomro & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi — Const. P. 625/2026 (SHC)

Official Citation: Const. P. 625/2026 (SHC)

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Parties: Const. P. 625/2026 (S.B.) Akhgar Anwar Awan vs Abdul Samad Soomro & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as Const. P. 625/2026 (SHC). In this matter between Const. P. 625/2026 (S.B.) Akhgar Anwar Awan and Abdul Samad Soomro & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: CITATION: PARTIES: ORDER DATE: BENCH: A.F.R: ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI C.P.No.S-625 of 2026 Akhgar Anwar Awan ………..v/s………Abdul Samad Soomro & others ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE(S) OF JUDGE(S) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.For hearing of CMA No.4439/2026 2.For hearing of main case.

06-08-2026

Petitioner present in person. Mr.Talha Azeem, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr.K.A. Vaswani, A.A.G.

----

Mr.Talha Azeem, Advocate undertakes to file Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No.2. 2. Petitioner present in person after arguing at some length, desires not to press this petition, however, he submits that Commissioner for Workmen Compensation and Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, East Division, Karachi may be directed to expedite t he matter and decide the same within a reasonable time, to which learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has no objection. 3. Accordingly, in view of above this petition is disposed of with directions to the authority to decide the application of the petitioner within 45 days time from date of receipt of this order. Office is directed to send copy of this order to Respondent No.1.

Judge nasir

Related Legal Research & Directories