Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD LATIF VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Abdul Razzaq A. Thaim Title: MUHAMMAD LATIF vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No,965 of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-10-13 Reported As: 1985 MLD 1369 Result: Petition accepted
Judgment ORDER ' This is an application for bail in a case registered under section 302, P.P.C. At Police Station Shah Faisal Colony on 12-3-1984. ' Briefly stated the facts of the prosecution case that one Zahoor-ud-Din was a tenant of complainant Iftikhar Mohiuddin. On 12-3-1984 complainant was informed by his Shaista that there was commotion outside the house. He went and saw that Zahooruddin was lying in the Gallery in injured condition. He was not able to talk. Iftikhar Mohiuddin went and lodged report in which he stated that some unknown persons have committed murder of Zahooruddin. ' Mr. Khawaja Naveed Ahmed learned counsel for the applicant has contended that this is an unwitnessed incident and there is no other evidence excepting that one Churri has been secured from the present applicant. ' Mr. M.I. Memon, Additional Advocate-General has no objection to the grant of bail. He states that there is no direct evidence against the applicant and Chhuri was also not blood-stained. The name of the applicant does not appear in the F.I.R. And there is no eye-witness of this incident. There is only evidence for production of non-blood-stained Chhuri and extra-judicial confession before police and other persons. I am of the opinion that this is a fit A case for bail. Accordingly I admit the applicant to bail on furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs,50,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.