SHAMSUZZAMAN BHUIYA vs UREA FERTILIZER FACTORY (E. P. I. D.C.PROJECT), — 1970 PLC 790

Citation: 1970 PLC 790

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-05-16

Parties: SHAMSUZZAMAN BHUIYA vs UREA FERTILIZER FACTORY (E. P. I. D.C.PROJECT), DACCA

Headnotes

Case cited as 1970 PLC 790

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): S. A. Haleem, Muhammad Karim, Nurul Islam Khan Title:SHAMSUZZAMAN BHUIYA vs UREA FERTILIZER FACTORY (E. P. I. D.C.PROJECT), DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 157 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-05-16 Reported As: 1970 PLC 790 Result: application is allowed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).---This is an application under section 25 (1) (b) of , the East. Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 which will be hereinafter mentioned as the Act. The case of the first party was that he was a permanent worker under the second party as Junior. Operator "fit the Urea Fertilizer Factory, Ghorasal, Dacca. Since hit employment on 5-3-1969, his pay was Rs. .280. On 4-3-1970 the second party abruptly terminated the services of the first S, party by an order with effect from 5-3-1970. This termination order was passed illegally, arbitrarily and by way of V, victimisation. The first party was granted only one months to notice pay in spite of the fact that the first party was permanent worker and that be was entitled to 90 days' notice pay, Compensation for 14 days, unveiled of leave salary, etc. No reason was assigned for terminating the services of the first party. But the second party recruited some more junior operators after the services of the first party were terminated. So it appears that the second party acted with mala fide intention. Being aggrieved the first party sent a grievance petition on 16-3-197fi under…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.