Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Soofi ABDUL QADIR VS Respondent: ANWAR alias PAPOO and 7 others
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Roshan Essani Title: Soofi ABDUL QADIR vs ANWAR alias PAPOO and 7 others Case No.: Criminal Revision No,94 of 1999 Date of Judgment:2000-10-30 Reported As: 2001 P Cr. L J 601 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER ' By this criminal revision application, the applicant Soofi Abdul Qadir has assailed the order, dated 13-10-1999 passed by the learned III-Additional Sessions Judge, Khairpur. ' The brief facts of the case are that the applicant/complainant filed direct complaint under section 220, 500, P.P.C. The learned III-Additional Sessions Judge after holding preliminary enquiry, dismissed the complaint by impugned order. ' I have heard the applicant and Mr. Sher Muhammad Shar, learned Assistant Advocate-General, Sindh on behalf of the State. The latter concedes to the prayer of the applicant/complainant and do not support the impugned order. . The perusal of the impugned order shows that no reasons have been assigned by the learned trial Court while dismissing the complaint which is a pre-requisite condition. The reasons must be such which could appeal to a reasonable and prudent mind. The same are lacking in the impugned order. ' Consequently, the revision application is allowed. The case is remanded to the learned trial Court to hold further enquiry into complaint and pass a legal and appropriate order assigning reasons in accordance with law, after examining the record and evidence and hearing the applicant/complainant. ' With these observations, the revision application stands disposed of.